Empowering functions of welfare conditionality in Poland – social workers’ perspective
Social Policy, Institute of Labour and Social Studies, Polska
Data nadesłania: 02-02-2023
Data ostatniej rewizji: 20-07-2023
Data akceptacji: 20-07-2023
Data publikacji online: 16-10-2023
Data publikacji: 16-10-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Paweł Poławski   

Social Policy, Institute of Labour and Social Studies, Bellottiego 3B, 01-022, Warsaw, Polska
Conditional policies are well established in modern European welfare states, being one of the most important economic and social reintegration instruments. The article assesses the relation between conditionality and empowerment in Polish social assistance, particularly through the use of a social contract (version of an individual action plan). The analysis drew on a survey conducted among managers in social assistance centres and social workers. Results showed a very high level of normative support for conditional welfare arrangements among social workers, similarly to the results of studies conducted in other countries. About half of the respondents supported individual social contracts as an effective empowerment instrument. Positive attitudes towards conditionality were related to its higher perceived psychological and professional empowering functions. The fit between adopted reintegration measures – social work, vocational training, psychological, and family support – and the perception of empowerment pointed to high organizational coherence in social assistance. The research also shows the importance of the normative acceptance of conditionality in social assistance, which is embedded in welfare policy even if not sufficiently expressed in social work practice.
Arak, P., Ivanov, A., Peleah, M., Płoszaj, A., Rakocy, K., Rok, J., & Wyszkowski, K. (2012). Krajowy Raport o Rozwoju Społecznym Polska 2012. Rozwój regionalny i lokalny. Biuro Projektowe UNDP w Polsce.
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality – What can be done? Harvard University Press.
Barker, N., & Lamble, S. (2009). From Social Security to Individual Responsibility: Sanctions, Conditionality, and Punitiveness in the Welfare Reform Bill (Part One). Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(3), 321–332.
Bieńko, M. (2012). Dylematy profesji i roli w refleksyjnym projekcie tożsamości współczesnego pracownika socjalnego. In M. Rymsza, M. (Ed.), Pracownicy socjalni i praca socjalna w Polsce. Między służbą społeczną a urzędem (pp. 93-120). Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Boland, T., & Griffin, R. (2015). The death of unemployment and the birth of job-seeking in welfare policy: governing a liminal experience. Irish Journal of Sociology. 23(2), 29–48. doi:10.7227/IJS.23.2.3.
Cerami, A., & Vanhuysse P. (2009). Introduction: Social Policy Pathways, Twenty Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall. In A. Cerami, P. Vanhuysse (Eds.), Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 1-14). Pallgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230245808.
Clark, Ch. (1998). Self-determination and Paternalism in Community Care: Practice and Prospects. The British Journal of Social Work, 28(3), 387-402.
Clarke, J. (2005). New Labour’s citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 447–463.
Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (2007). Levels and levers of conditionality – measuring change in mature welfare states. In J. Clasen & N. A. Siegel (Eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change. The Dependent Variable Problems in Comparative Analysis (pp. 166-197). Edward Elgar.
Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Cornell University Press.
Deacon, A. (2004). Justifying Conditionality. The Case of Anti‐Social Tenants. Housing Studies, 19(6), 911–926.
Delsen, L. (Ed.). (2019). Empirical Research on an Unconditional Basic Income in Europe. Springer.
Dubois, K., & Krosgrud, M. (2014). Social Work. An Empowering Profession. Pearson Education.
Dwyer, P. (2004). Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 265–287.
Gjersøe, H. M., Leseth, A., & Vilhena, S. (2020). Frontline implementation of welfare conditionality in Norway: A maternalistic practice. Social Policy & Administration, 54(3), 491–504.
Goodin, R. E. (2002). Structures of mutual obligations. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 579-596.
Golczyńska-Grondas, A., & Kretek-Kamińska, A. (2007). Kontrakt socjalny – założenia a realizacja. Przykład łódzki. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 58(1), 149–173.
Golinowska, S. (2003). Od państwa opiekuńczego (welfare state) do państwa wspierającego pracę (workfare state). In B. Balcerzak-Paradowska (Ed.), Praca i polityka społeczna wobec wyzwań integracji (pp. 22-40). Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Golinowska, S. (2009). The National Model of the Welfare State in Poland. Tradition and Changes. In S. Golinowska, P. Hengstenberg, & M. Żukowski (Eds.), Diversity and Commonality in European Social Policies: The Forging of a European Social Model (pp. 213-260). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Gray, A. (2004). Unsocial Europe. Social Protection or Flexploitation? Pluto Press.
Griggs, J., & Evans M. (2010). Sanctions within conditional benefit systems. A review of evidence. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Guterman, N. B., & Bargal, D. (1996). Social workers' perceptions of their power and service outcomes. Administration in Social Work, 20(3), 1–20.
Guttiérez, L. M., Glenmaye, L. F., & DeLois, K. (1995). The organizational context of empowerment practice. Social Work, 40(2), 249-158.
Hryniewicka, A. (2011). Różne wymiary skuteczności w pomocy społecznej. Instytut Rozwoju Służb Socjalnych.
Ingold, J. (2018). Employer engagement in active labour market programmes: The role of boundary spanners. Public Administration, 96(4), 707–720.
Jacobsson, K., Wallinder, Y., & Seing, I. (2020). Street-level bureaucrats under new managerialism: a comparative study of agency cultures and caseworker role identities in two welfare state bureaucracies. Journal of Professions & Organization, 7(3), 316–333.
Janowska, Z. (2018). Skuteczność aktywizacji społeczno-zawodowej beneficjentów pomocy społecznej szansą na ograniczenie państwa opiekuńczego w Polsce. In M. Bednarski & Z. Wiśniewski (Eds.), Polityka społeczna w Polsce Osiągnięcia i Wyzwania (pp. 166-179). Komitet Nauk o Pracy i Polityce Społecznej PAN.
Kaźmierczak, T. (2012), W cieniu prawa o ubogich: o źródłach i rozwoju (praktykowanej w OPS) pracy socjalnej. In T. Kaźmierczak & M. Rymsza (Eds.), W stronę aktywnych służb społecznych (pp 109-132). Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Kaźmierczak, T. (2014). Narzędzia indywidualizacji usług reintegracyjnych. In A. Karwacki T. Kaźmierczak & M. Rymsza (Eds.), Reintegracja. Aktywna polityka społeczna w praktyce (pp. 203-228). Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Open University Press.
Klammer, U., Leiber, S., & Leitner, S. (2019a). Social Work and the Making of Social Policy. Policy Press.
Klammer, U., Leiber, S., & Leitner, S. (2019b). Introduction: social work and the making of social policy. In U. Klammer, S. Leiber, & S. Leitner (Eds.), Social Work and the Making of Social Policy (pp. 1–18). Bristol University Press.
Lee, J. (2001). The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage.
Macomane, Z. (2012). Role of Families in Social and Economic Empowerment on Individuals, United Nations Expert Group Meeting on “Promoting Empowerment of People in Achieving Poverty Eradication, Social Integration and Full Employment and Decent Work for All”, 10-12 September 2012. United Nations.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 15(2), 103–111.
Meyers, M., & Vorsanger, S. (2003). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.) Handbook of public administration (pp. 245-256). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mcdonald, C., & Morston, G. (2005). Workfare as welfare: Governing Unemployed in the Advanced Liberal State. Critical Social Policy, 25(3), 374-401.
Mead, L. M. (Ed.), (1997). The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Brookings Institution.
Nothdurfter, U. (2016). The street-level delivery of activation policies: constraints and possibilities for a practice of citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 420–440.
Nothdurfter, U., & Hermans, K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street‐level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 294–304.
Parsons, R. J. (1991). Empowerment. Purpose and practice principle in social work. Social Work with Groups, 14(2), 7-21.
Patrick, R., Mead, L. M., Gregg, P., & Seebohm, P. (2011). The wrong perception: disabled people and welfare conditionality. Policy & Politics, 39(2), 275-291.
Peck, J. (2002). Workfare states. Guildford Press.
Poławski, P. (2018). Punitywność i sankcje socjalne w pomocy społecznej. In P. Poławski (Ed.), Warunkowość i kontraktualizm w pomocy społecznej. Lokalne zróżnicowanie i społeczne konsekwencje (pp. 68-96). Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Poławski, P. (2019). Layering, social risks and manufactured uncertainties in social work in Poland. In U. Klammer, S. Leiber, & S. Leitner (Eds.), Social Work and the Making of Social Policy (pp. 185–200). Bristol University Press.
Poławski, P. (2021). Responding to New Social Risks. The Southernization of Social Welfare in Poland? Social Work & Society, Volume 19, Issue 2. https://ejournals.bib.uni-wupp....
Porter, C., & Dornan P. (2013). The Implications of Conditionality in Social Assistance Programmes. In R. Surender & R. Walker (Eds.), Social Policy in a Developing World (pp. 155-171). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Raeymaeckers, P., & Dierckx, D. (2013). To Work or Not to Work? The Role of the Organisational Context for Social Workers’ Perceptions on Activation. The British Journal of Social Work, 43(6), 1170–1189.
Reamer, F. G. (1983). Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Practice. Social Work, 28(1), 31–35.
Reamer, F. G. (2005). Eye on Ethics. The Challenge of Paternalism in Social Work. Social Work Today, January/February. news/eoe_0105.shtml.
Reeves, A., & Loopstra, R. (2017). Set up to fail? How Welfare Conditionality Undermines Citizenship for Vulnerable Groups. Social Policy and Society, 16(2). 327-338.
Ruch, G. (2010). The contemporary context of relationship-based practice. In G. Ruch, D. Turney, & A. Ward (Eds.), Relationship-based social work: getting to the heart of practice (pp. 13-28). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Rymsza, M. (Ed.). (2011). Czy podejście aktywizujące ma szansę? Pracownicy socjalni i praca socjalna w Polsce 20 lat po reformie systemu pomocy społecznej. Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Rymsza, M. (2012). W stronę pracy środowiskowej i nowych ról zawodowych pracowników socjalnych. In M. Rymsza (Ed.), Pracownicy socjalni i praca socjalna w Polsce. Między służbą społeczną a urzędem (pp. 203-226). Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Rymsza, M. (2013). Aktywizacja w polityce społecznej. W stronę rekonstrukcji europejskich welfare states? IFiS PAN.
Rymsza, M., & Karwacki, A. (2017). Między podejściem empowerment a zarządzaniem underclass. Dwa modele aktywizacji w polityce społecznej. In A. Karwacki, M. Rymsza, B. Gąciarz, T. Kaźmierczak & B. Skrzypczak (Eds.), Niezatrudnieniowe wymiary aktywizacji. W stronę modelu empowerment? (pp. 15-62). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Sadeghi, T., & Terum, L. I. (2020). Frontline managers’ perception and justifications of behavioural conditionality. Social Policy and Administration Special Issue: International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Welfare Conditionality, 54(2), 219-235.
Sadeghi, T., & Fekjær, S. B. (2019). Frontline workers’ competency in activation work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 28(1), 77–88.
Sage, D. (2012). Fair Conditions and Fair Consequences? Exploring New Labour, Welfare Contractualism and Social Attitudes. Social Policy & Society, 11(3). 359-373.
Schram, S., Fording, R., & Soss, J. (2008). Neo-Liberal Poverty Governance. Race, Place and the Punitive Turn in US Welfare Policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(1), 17–36.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined, Oxford University Press.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C., Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
Sowa-Kofta, A. (2018). Ustalanie treści kontraktów i paternalizm w formułowaniu warunków kontraktu socjalnego. In P. Poławski (Ed.), Warunkowość i kontraktualizm w pomocy społecznej. Lokalne zróżnicowanie i społeczne konsekwencje (pp. 229-250). Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
Standing, G. (2011). Behavioral Conditionality: Why the Nudges Must be Stopped – an Opinion Piece. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(1), 27-38.
Törrönen, M., Borodkina, O., & Samoylova, V. (2013). Trust in reciprocal relationships – The construction of well-being. In M. Törrönen, O. Borodkina, V. Samoylova & E. Heino (Eds.). Empowering Social Work: Research and Practice (pp.8-18). University of Helsinki.
Trætteberg, H. S., & Grødem, A. S. (2022). From national activation legislation to local practices in Norway—Why the same law gives diverse practices. International Journal of Social Welfare, 31(2), 154–164.
Trochymiak, M. (2018). Kontrakt socjalny a relacje z klientami pomocy społecznej. In P. Poławski (Ed.), Warunkowość i kontraktualizm w pomocy społecznej. Lokalne zróżnicowanie i społeczne konsekwencje (pp. 195-228). Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Van Berkel, R., & Valkenburg, B. (2007). Making it personal: individualising activation services in the EU. Bristol University Press.
Van Berkel, R. (2017). The street‐level activation of the unemployed remote and very remote from the labour market. The Dutch case. In R. Van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline delivery of welfare‐to‐work policies in Europe: Activating the unemployed (pp.144-162). Routledge.
Van Berkel, R. Larsen, S. & Caswell, D. (2018). Introduction: Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work in different European contexts. International Social Security Review, 71(4), 3–11.
Van Berkel, R. (2020). Making welfare conditional. A street-level perspective. Social Policy Administration, 54(2), 191-204.
Vanhuysse, P. (2001). The Political Economy of Pensions: Western Theories, Eastern Facts. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (5), 853-61.
Venn, D. (2012). Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment Benefits. Quantitative Indicators for OECD and EU Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers.
Vilhena, S. (2021). Is it because you can’t, or don’t want to? The implementation of frontline sanctions in Norwegian social assistance. European Journal of Social Work, 24(3), 418–429.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (2008). Urban outcasts: a comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Polity Press.
Watts, B., Fitzpatrick, S., Bramley, G., & Watkins, D. (2014). Welfare Sanctions and Conditionality in the UK. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Watts, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2018). Welfare conditionality. Key Ideas. Routledge.
Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2007). Social workers attitudes towards social welfare policy. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 349–357.
White, S. (2003). The civic minimum; On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Woźniak, W. (2012). Nierówności społeczne w polskim dyskursie politycznym. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Zalewski, D. (2018). Kontrakt socjalny a prekaryzacja klientów pomocy społecznej. In P. Poławski (Ed.), Warunkowość i kontraktualizm w pomocy społecznej. Lokalne zróżnicowanie i społeczne konsekwencje (pp. 271-289). Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top