The reception and integration of refugees from Ukraine in Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary – the New Immigration Destinations of Central Europe
Cracow University of Economics, Center for Advanced Studies of Population and Religion, Polska
London School of Economics, Department of Social Policy, United Kingdom
Konrad Pędziwiatr   

Cracow University of Economics, Center for Advanced Studies of Population and Religion, ul. Rakowicka, 27, 31-510, Kraków, Poland, Polska
Data nadesłania: 24-12-2022
Data ostatniej rewizji: 02-04-2023
Data akceptacji: 03-04-2023
Data publikacji online: 15-05-2023
Data publikacji: 15-05-2023
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2022;59(4):345–377
The aim of this article is to assess the policy response deployed by the Visegrad Group countries (Poland, Czechia, Hungary, Slovakia) during the humanitarian crisis of displacement following the beginning of brutal Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in the light of the theoretical framework of New Immigration Destinations (NID). Such a framework is introduced and assessed as relevant to explain how the scant previous experience of public institutions and the wider society in addressing the needs of forced migrants, and migrants’ presence in general, impacts reception and integration of refugees in the region. The paper explores the relevance of NID in analysis of forced migrants’ situation in Central Europe. The study is based on qualitative methods, including desk research, expert interviews in four analysed countries, and legislation analysis. The paper argues that in the wake of the humanitarian crisis on an unprecedented scale, the lack of experience, coupled with scarce infrastructure, insufficient legal framework and resourcing, and poor coordination of different stakeholder groups’ engagement, impeded and delayed the implementation of the newly-established policy tools, and in some cases led to the lack of an adequate and timely state-coordinated response.
Ager, A. & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. Anatolie, C. (2018). Measuring integration in new countries of immigration. Social Change Review, 16(1–2), 93–121. DOI: 10.2478/scr-2018-0003.
Androvičová, J. (2016). The Migration and Refugee Crisis in Political Discourse in Slovakia: Institutionalized Securitization and Moral Panic. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia, 16(2), 39–64, DOI: 10.14712/23363231.2017.11.
3. (2022). Access to the Labour Market, Hungary,
Babická, K. (2022). Temporary Protection: Poland and Hungary Once Again Creating Their Own Rules in Breach of EU Law.
Bálint, L., Csányi, Z., Farkas, M., & Hluchány, H. (2017). International migration and official migration statistics in Hungary. Regional Statistics, 7(2), 101–123, DOI: 10.15196/RS070203.
6. (2022) Zgłoszenie uchodźców możliwe wstecz. Hotelarze otrzymają świadczenie.
Bíró-Nagy, A. (2022). Orbán’s political jackpot: migration and the Hungari an electorate. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 405–424. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905.
Bolečeková, M. (2021). Reflections of EU Migration and Refugee Crisis in Slovak Foreign and Security Policy. Security Dimensions. International and National Stud ies, 39(39), 70–83. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.6530.
Brzozowski, J. & Pędziwiatr, K. (2014). Analiza procesu integracji imigrantów w Małopolsce. In E. Pindel (red.). Imigranci w Małopolsce. Między integracją, asymi lacją, separacją, marginalizacją. (117–240). Akademia “Ignatianum”.
Bures, O. & Stojanov, R. (2022). Securitization of Immigration in the Czech Repub lic and Its Impact on the Czech Migration Policy: Experts’ Perceptions. Problems of Post-Communism.
Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promot ing a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bear ing the consequences thereof. (2001).
Council’s Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 of 4 March 2022 establishing the exist ence of a mass influx of displaced persons from Ukraine within the meaning of Article 5 of Directive 2001/55/EC, and having the effect of introducing temporary protection. (2022).
Czech Statistical Office. (2020). Foreigners by type of residence, sex, and citizenship as at 31 December 2020.
Drbohlav, D. (2005). The Czech Republic: from Liberal Policy to EU Membership. Migration Policy Institute, 1.
Drbohlav, D. (2012). Patterns of immigration in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Po land. A comparative perspective. In M. Okólski (Ed.). European Immigrations. Trends, Structures and Policy Implications. (179–210). Amsterdam University Press.
Drbohlav D. & Jaroszewicz M. (eds.). (2016). Ukrainian Migration in Times of Crisis, Forced and Labour Mobility. Charles University Faculty of Science.
Dumont, J. (2022). In Budapest, Hungarian families open their homes to displaced Ukrainians. InfoMigrants.
Duszczyk, M., Podgórska, K., & Pszczółkowska, D. (2020). From mandatory to vol untary. Impact of V4 on the EU relocation scheme. European Politics and Society, 21(4), 470–487. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1672367.
Duszczyk, M., Pszczółkowska, D. & Wach, D. (2018). Warsaw, A new immigration city in search of its integration policy towards newcomers. In T. Caponio, P. Scholten, and R. Zapata-Barrero (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities. Routledge.
European Parliament. (1999). Migration and Asylum in Central and Eastern Europe: Czech Republic.
European Commission. (2021). Hungary: Latest immigration statistics.
European Commission. (2022a). Access to health care in EU countries for per sons displaced from Ukraine.
European Commission. (2022b). Slovakia: Challenges in the education of refugee children from Ukraine.
European Commission. (2022c). Slovakia: Ukrainian children at risk of unsuccessful integration into educational system.
European Commission. (2022d). Slovakia: Inadequate resources at the local level for the in tegration of new arrivals from Ukraine.
European Commission. (2022e). Slovakia: Integration infrastructure improving as a re sult of new arrivals from Ukraine.
Eurostat. (2022). Asylum applicants by type of applicant, citizenship, age and sex – an nual aggregated data.
Eurostat. (2022a). All valid permits by reason on 31 December of each year.
Eurostat. (2022b). All valid permits by reason, length of validity and citizenship on 31 December of each year.
Eurostat. (2022c). Population on 1 January by age group, sex and citizenship.
Eurostat. (2022d). Population change – Demographic balance and crude rates at national lev el.
EWL. (2022). Raport specjalny. Uchodźcy z Ukrainy w Polsce. Platforma migracyjna EWL i Studium Europy Wschodniej UW.
Everitt, G.J. & Levinson, B.A. (2014). Inhabited Institutions in New Destina tions: Local Sense-Making and Institutional Work in Community Response to New Immigration. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45(2), 115–142, DOI: 10.1177/0891241614550757.
Flippen, C.A & Farrell-Bryan, D. (2021). New Destinations and the Changing Geog raphy of Immigrant Incorporation. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(479–500). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-100926.
Fundamental Rights Agency. (2022). National legislation implementing the EU Temporary Protection Directive in selected EU Member States (August 2022 update). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Gödri, I. (2019). International Migration. In J. Monostori, P. Őri, P. and Zs. Spéder (eds.). Demographic Portrait of Hungary 2018. (237–271). HDRI.
Gödri, I., Soltész, B., & Bodacz-Nagy, B. (2014). Immigration or emigration coun try? Migration trends and their socio-economic background in Hungary: A longer-term historical perspective. Working Papers, 19.
GUS. (2017). Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2016.
GUS. (2018). Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach czasowej emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2017.
Gyollai, D. (2018). Hungary – Country Report: Legal and Policy Framework of Mi gration Governance. Global Migration: Consequences and Responses – RE SPOND Working Paper Series, 05.
Gyollai, D. & Korkut, U. (2020). Working Papers Global Migration: Consequences and Responses Paper 2020/43, Reception Policies, Practices and Responses Hungary Country Report. Glasgow Caledonian University.
Hall, M. (2013). Residential Integration on the New Frontier: Immigrant Segrega tion in Established and New Destinations. Demography, 50(5), 1873–1896. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-012-0177-x.
Hudec, M. (2022). Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia: Rośnie niechęć wobec ukraińskich uchodźców.
Hungarian Helsinki Committee. (2022). Frequently asked questions and answers for refugees from Ukraine.
Illés, S., Kincses, A., & Simonyi, P. (2022). From fluid migration to stable circular migration: A case study from Hungary. Acta Geographica Slovenica, Geografski Zbornik, 62(1), 21–36.
46. (2022). Świadczenie 40 zł za dzień dłużej niż 120 dni za pomoc Ukrainkom w ciąży, osobom w wieku 60/65 lat i matkom trójki dzieci.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2022). Preventing a sec ond crisis: Health needs extend beyond Ukraine’s borders warns IFRC.
International Organisation for Migration. (2022). Migration in Slovakia.
Janicek, K., & Gec, J. (2022). Months into war, Ukraine refugees slow to join EU work force.
Kavanová, M., Prokop, D., Bicanová, J., & Kunc, M. (2022). Hlas Ukrajinců: Zkušenos ti uprchlíků s bydlením v Česku a výhled do budoucna.
Kicinger, A. (2009). Beyond the Focus on Europeanisation: Polish Migration Pol icy 1989–2004. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 35(1), 79–95. DOI: 10.1080/13691830802489200.
Kissová, L. (2017). The Production of (Un)deserving and (Un)acceptable: Shifting Representations of Migrants within Political Discourse in Slovakia. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 32(4), 743–766. DOI: 10.1177/0888325417745127.
Klaus, W. (2017). Security First: New Right-Wing Government in Poland and its Policy Towards Immigrants and Refugees. Surveillance & Society, 3(15), 523–528. DOI: 10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6627.
Klaus, W., Lévay, M., Rzeplińska, I., & Scheinost, M. (2018). Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Central European Countries: Reality, Politics and the Creation of Fear in Societies. In H. Kury and S. Redo (eds.). Refugees and Migrants in Law and Pol icy, Challenges and Opportunities for Global Civic Education. (457–495). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72159-0.
Kriglerova, E.G. (2022). Slovakia is ready for people from Ukraine, but politicians may ruin it (again). Minority Policy, 2022/01.
Legut, A. & Pędziwiatr, K. (2018). Sekurytyzacja migracji w polityce polskiej a zmiana postaw Polaków wobec uchodźców. In R. Jończy (red.). Sami Swoi? Wielokulturow ość We Współczesnej Europie. Dom Współpracy Polsko-Niemieckiej. (41–51). Dom Współpracy Polsko-Niemieckiej.
Letavajová, S. & Divinský, B. (2019). Common Home Publication, Migration and Development in Slovakia. Caritas Slovakia.
Lezova, K. (2015). Why Slovakia has become the focal point for opposition against EU refugee quotas.
Łodziński, S. & Szonert, M. (2016). „Niepolityczna polityka”? Kształtowanie się polityki migracyjnej w Polsce w latach 1989–2016 (kwiecień). CMR Working Papers, 90/148.
Macareavey, R. & Argent, N. (2018a). Migrant integration in rural New Immigration Destinations: An institutional and triangular perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 64. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.08.001.
Macareavey, R. & Argent, N. (2018b). New Immigration Destinations (NID) unravel ling the challenges and opportunities for migrants and for host communities. Jour nal of Rural Studies, 64, 148–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.006.
Magdziarz, W. (2022). The changes in the Polish local governments’ involvement in the im plementation and development of the refugee policy in the wake of the humanitarian crisis of displacement caused by the Russian aggression against Ukraine. MSc ISPP (research) Dissertation, unpublished. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Department of Social Policy.
Magdziarz, W., Chwat, O., & Styrnol, N. (2021). Polska polityka migracyjna w budowie. Analiza sytuacji migrantów i migrantek w pandemii COVID-19 z perspektywy od powiedzi instytucjonalnej na szczeblu lokalnym. Przykład województwa małopolsk iego. Horyzonty Polityki, 12(40). DOI: 10.35765/hp.2127.
Magdziarz, W. & Styrnol., N. (2021). Społeczne sieci wsparcia migrantek i migrantów zarobkowych z Ukrainy w Zakopanem i okolicznych miejscowościach powiatu ta trzańskiego w dobie kryzysu związanego z pandemią COVID-19. Raport z badań tere nowych. Raport CeBaM UAM, 1/2021. Centrum Badań Migracyjnych.
Malynovska, O. (2021). Migrations in Ukraine Facts and Figures. International Organ isation for Migration.
Marrow, H. (2009). Immigrant Bureaucratic Incorporation: The Dual Roles of Profes sional Missions and Government Policies. American Sociological Review, 74(5),756– 776.
Marrow, H. (2013). Assimilation in New Destinations. Dædalus, 142(3), 107–222.
Matusz-Protasiewicz, P. & Kwieciński, L. (2018). Development of local integration policies of migrants – case of Gdańsk and Wrocław. Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, 43(4), 125–142.
Mesežnikov, G. & Bútorová, Z. (2019). Refugee crisis in Europe: Public opinion, state institutions and party politics in Slovakia. In J. Kucharczyk and G. Mesežnikov (eds.). Phantom Menace. The Politics and Policies of Migration in Central Europe, 53–79. Institute for Public Affairs, Heinrich Boell Stiftung.
MRiPS. (2022, August 2). Zatrudnienie w Polsce uchodźców ukraińskich. Twitter.
Ministerstvo vnútra SR. (2022a). Azyl a migrácia. Štatistiky.
Ministerstvo vnútra SR. (2022b). Registrácia dočasného útočiska.
Narkowicz, K. & Pędziwiatr, K. (2017). Saving and fearing Muslim women in ‘post-com munist’ Poland: troubling Catholic and secular Islamophobia. Gender, Place & Cul ture, 24(2), 288–299. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1298574.
Mucha, J. (2021). Integration of Migrants in a Major Polish City. Kraków’s Public Cul tural Institutions and the “New Ukrainians”. Migration Studies – Review of Polish Diaspora, 3(181), 269–292. DOI: 10.4467/25444972SMPP.21.041.14461
National Directorate-General for Aliens Policing (2022). Care and Benefits Provid ed for Beneficiaries of Temporary Protection.
OECD. (2018). Settling In 2018, Indicators of Immigrant Integration.
OECD. (2022a). OECD Policy Responses on the Impacts of the War in Ukraine. https:// cname=guest&checksum=941FBE56A6320396AE3D82472744A6A9.
OECD. (2022b). Rights and Support for Ukrainian Refugees in Receiving Countries. https:// cname=guest&checksum=36F5F32206A2D963BF9D5DCE090249E4.
Otto-Duszczyk, P. & Nowosielska, P. (2022, May 16). Prawie 700 tys. Ukraińskich dzieci wnioskuje o 500 plus.
Pancevski, B. (2019). Hungary, Loudly Opposed to Immigration, Opens Doors to More Foreign Workers.
Papcunová, J. (2022). Where is the Public Opinion in the Reception of Refugees from Ukraine?.
PAQ. (2022). Integration of Ukrainian refugees in the Czech Republic 2022+. České Priority.
Pędziwiatr, K. & Legut, A. (2017). Polskie rządy wobec unijnej strategii na rzecz przeciwdziałania kryzysowi migracyjnemu. In K. Wojtaszczyk and J. Szymańska (red.) Uchodźcy w Europie: Uwarunkowania, Istota, Następstwa. (671–693). Oficyna Wydawnicza „Aspra-JR”.
Pędziwiatr, K., Brzozowski, J., & Nahorniuk, O. (2022a). Uchodźcy z Ukrainy w Krakowie. Obserwatorium Wielokulturowości i Migracji. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28417.53600 Pędziwiatr, K., Stonawski, M., & Brzozowski, J. (2022b). Imigranci ekonomiczni i przymusowi w Krakowie w 2022 roku. Raport Obserwatorium Wielokulturowoś ci i Migracji
Robinson, D. (2010). The Neighbourhood Effects of New Immigration. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(10), 2451–2466. DOI: 10.1068/a4364 Roth, B.J. & Grace, B. (2018). Structural Barriers to Inclusion in a Latino Immigrant New Destination: Exploring the Adaptive Strategies of Social Service Organiza tions in South Carolina. International Migration & Integration, 19(4), 1075–1093. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-018-0587-8.
Scott, J.W. (2021). Visegrád four political regionalism as a critical reflection of Euro peanization: deciphering the “Illiberal Turn”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(6), 704–725. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2021.1972023.
Sobczak-Szelc K., Pachocka, M., Pędziwiatr K., Szałańska J., & Szulecka M. (2022). From Reception to Integration of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Poland. Routledge. Stonawski, M., Brzozowski, J., Pędziwiatr, K. & Georgati, M. (2022). Investigating neighbourhood concentration of immigrants in Poland: explorative evidence from Kraków. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 56(56), 143–159. DOI: http://
88. (2022). Ubľa končí s pomocou utečencom z Ukrajiny. Štát obci stále nepreplatil výdavky.
Teke Lloyd, A. & Sirkeci, I. (2022). A Long-Term View of Refugee Flows from Ukraine: War, Insecurities, and Migration. Migration Letters, 19(4), 523–535. DOI: 10.33182/ ml.v19i4.2313.
Temesi, I. (2019). Local Self-Governments in Dealing with Mass Migrations and Inte gration of Migrants in Hungary. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 19(3), 455–472. DOI: 10.31297/hkju.19.3.5.
The Office of Labour, Family and Social Affairs. (2021). Zamestnávanie cudzincov na území Slovenskej republiky za rok 2021.
Tupá, M. & Krajčo, K. (2019). Evaluation of Economic Consequences of Refugee Migration in Germany and Slovakia. University Review, 13(4), 31–36,
UMP. (2022a). Miejska gościnność – Aktualizacja. Szacunek liczby Ukraincow w mias tach UMP marzec, kwiecień, maj 2022 r. Centrum Analiz i Badań Unii Metropolii Polskich im. Pawła Adamowicza.
UMP. (2022b). Sąsiedzka pomoc. Mieszkańcy 12 największych polskich miast o pomocy uchodźcom z Ukrainy. Unia Metropolii Polskich.
UNHCR. (2022a). Lives on Hold: Profiles and Intentions of Refugees from Ukraine.
UNHCR. (2022b). Ukraine Refugee Situation – Operational Data Portal.
UNHCR. (2022c). Help, Hungary. Temporary Protection. hungary/temporary-protection/.
UNHCR. (2022d). Help, Slovakia, Temporary Protection. temporary-protection/#:~:text=It%20is%20currently%20the%20simplest,2023 %20and%20might%20be%20extended.
UNHCR. (2022e). Help, Hungary, Health Care.
UNICEF. (2022). Education sector. Hande Dilaver. [PPT presentation, Material pre sented during the UNHCR-led coordination meeting in Kraków]. United Nations. (2022). Hungary, Social Indicators.
Ustawa z dnia 12 marca 2022 r. o pomocy obywatelom Ukrainy w związku z konfliktem zbrojnym na terytorium tego państwa, Dz.U. 2022 poz. 583] with the further amend ments.
Ústredie práce, sociálnych vecí a rodiny. (2022a). Projekt „Pomáhame odídencom – po radenstvo“ / ПРОЄКТ „ДОПОМАГАЄМО БІЖЕНЦЯМ – КОНСУЛЬТАЦІЇ”.
Ústredie práce, sociálnych vecí a rodiny. (2022b). Useful information for citizens of Ukraine.
Vermeersch, P. (2005). EU enlargement and immigration policy in Poland and Slo vakia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38(1), 71–88. DOI: 10.1016/j. postcomstud.2005.01.006.
Visit (2022a). Where to receive free medical care for refugees in Slovakia?.
Visit (2022b). Hungary has simplified employment conditions for Ukrainians. conditions-for-ukrainians.
Wesolowsky, T. (2022). As Czech Support For Refugees Wanes, Ukrainians Flee ing The War Are Facing Tougher Choices.
Winders, J. (2014). New Immigrant Destinations in Global Context. International Mi gration Review, 48(S1), S149–S179. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12140.
Zymnin, A. (2022). Survey: More than half of the refugees from Ukraine intend to take up employment during their stay in the Czech Republic.