STUDIA
The CEE countries’ first decade of EU membership: from policy-takers towards agenda-setters?
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Senior Lecturer in Government School of Government and International Affairs
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Christian Schweiger   

Email: christian.schweiger@durham.ac.uk
Data publikacji: 27-05-2020
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2015;31:99–118
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE ARTYKUŁU
The accession of the group of eight post-communist Central and Eastern European member states who joined in 2004 marked a historic watershed in the development of the European Union. The subsequent enlargements in 2004 represented the biggest expansion of the EU’s membership base since the beginning of the institutionalised process of institutional European integration after the end of WW2. Even more importantly however, it constituted the official end of more than four decades in which the European continent had been artificially divided into two ideological and military blocs by the Cold War. This article concentrates on the 2004 enlargement and analyses how the CEE-8 group has integrated into the EU’s institutional and policy acquis over the past decade. In this respect the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008–09 represents a major challenge for the countries of the region in their ongoing political, economic and social transformation since the fall of communism. The paper examines to what extent the CEE countries have managed to tackle the multiple challenges of the post-communist transition and which factors have determined their status as predominantly passive policy-takers. Special emphasis is put on the impact of the 2008–09 global financial crisis, which poses the risk of backsliding the CEE’s domestic political and economic transition process and growing alienation from the increasingly complex new coordinative EU policy mechanisms. The article also considers the potential future role of the semi-institutionalised cooperation amongst the Visegrád 4 group (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) in effectively promoting the interests of the wider CEE region in the EU. The main challenge in this respect lies in the persistent diversity of national interests and varying levels of commitment towards transnational cooperation amongst the V4 and the wider CEE group. This especially applies to the regional leader Poland, which has been torn between the ambition to intensify regional cooperation and the desire to become a leading player in the EU alongside France and Germany.
 
REFERENCJE (71)
1.
Agh A. (2012), The Hungarian Rhapsodies: The Conflict of Adventurism and Professionalism in the European Union Presidency, „Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 50, Issue Supplement s2 (Annual Review), pp. 68–75.
 
2.
Agh A. (2013), Progress Report on the new member states: 20 years of social&political developments, Budapest: College of Communication and Business.
 
3.
Agh A. (2014), Ten years of catching-up story in the European Union: Differentiated integration and multilevel governance in ECE, in: A. Agh, T. Kaiser, B. Koller (ed.) 10 years after: Multi-level governance and differentiated integration in the EU, Budapest: Blue Ribbon Research Centre, pp. 31–61.
 
4.
Aslund A. (2010), The Last shall be the First: The East European Financial Crisis, Washington: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
 
5.
Auer, S. (2015), The limits of transnational solidarity and the eurozone crisis in Germany, Ireland and Slovakia, in: The effects of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis: Differentiated integration between the centre and the new peripheries of the EU, C. Schweiger and J.M. Magone (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 64–77.
 
6.
Barysch K. (2006), East versus West? The EU economy after enlargement, London: Centre for European Reform.
 
7.
Birdwell J., Feve S., Tryhorn C., Vibla N. (2013), Democracy in Europe can no longer be taken for granted: Backsliders, London: Demos.
 
8.
Blair T. (2000), A superpower, but not a superstate, Speech at the Warsaw Stock Exchange, 7 October, http://www.theguardian.com/pol... [access: 24.07. 2015].
 
9.
Black R., Engbersen G., Okólski and Pantîru C. (2010), Working out a way from East to West: EU enlargement and labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe, Amsterdam: University Press, pp. 7–22.
 
10.
Bulmer S. and Paterson W.E. (2013), Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strength and political constraints, „Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 20, issue 10, pp. 1387–1405.
 
11.
Bojkov V.D. (2004), Neither here, nor there: Bulgaria and Romania in current European politics, „Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, Vol. 37, issue 4, pp. 509–522.
 
12.
Borrell J. (2015), About the democratic governance of the euro: How the crisis is changing Europe, in: S. Champeau, C. Closa, D. Innerarity and M.P. Maduro (ed.) The future of Europe: Democracy, legitimacy and justice after the euro crisis, London: Roman and Littlefield, pp. 235–247.
 
13.
Cameron D. (2014), The Spectator, Speech on migration, 28 November, http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/c... [access: 6.08.2015].
 
14.
Copeland P. (2014), Central and Eastern Europe: Negotiating influence in an enlarged European Union, „Europe-Asia Studies”, Vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 467–487.
 
15.
Dimitrov V. (2012), The Central and East European countries: From weak latecomers to good citizens of the Union, in: J. Hayward, R. Wurzel (ed.) European Disunion: Between Sovereignty and Solidarity, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
 
16.
Dimitrova A. and Toshkov D. (2009), Post-accession compliance between administrative co-ordination and political bargaining, „European Integration online Papers”, Vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 1–18.
 
17.
Dobson J.R. and Sennikova I. (2007), From fundamental freedom to political and economic ‘hot potato’ in 50 years: Labour mobility and migration within the EU, „Journal of Business Economics and Management”, Vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 123–136.
 
18.
Duszczyk M. (2015), Poland under Economic Crisis Conditions, in: C. Schweiger, J.M. Magone (ed.) The Effects of the Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis: Differentiated integration between the Centre and the New Peripheries of the EU, London: Routledge, pp. 112–126.
 
19.
Duval Smith A. (2015), Fear and xenophobia poison Polish polls, „The Guardian”, 23 October, http://www.theguardian.com/wor... [access: 5.11.2015].
 
20.
Dyson K. and Marcussen M. (2010), Transverse integration in European Economic governance: Between unitary and differentiated integration, „Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 17–40.
 
21.
Dyson K. (2012), Economic and Monetary Disunion? in: J. Hayward, R. Wurzel (ed.) European disunion: Between sovereignty and solidarity, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 181–200.
 
22.
EUR-Lex (1999), Agenda 2000: for a stronger and wider Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV:l60001 [access: 27.07.2015].
 
23.
European Commission (2003), Flash Eurobarometer 140: Enlargement of the European Union, 11 April, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opi... [access: 25.07.2015].
 
24.
European Commission (2004), The transitional arrangement for the free movement of workers from the new member states following enlargement of the European Union on 1 May 2004, http://ec.europa.eu/social/Blo... [access: 29.07. 2015].
 
25.
European Commission (2005), Internal Market Scoreboard No. 14, July, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_m... [access: 1.08.2015].
 
26.
European Commission (2007), Flash Eurobarometer: Introduction of the euro in the new member states, http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontO... [access: 3.08.2015].
 
27.
European Commission (2015), Standard Eurobarometer 83, http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontO... [access: 3.08.2015].
 
28.
European Council (1999), Berlin European Council Presidency Conclusions, 24/25 March, at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/... [access: 27.07.2015].
 
29.
European Council (2001), Presidency Conclusions Council meeting in Laeken 14/15 December, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r... [access: 26.07.2015].
 
30.
Eurostat (2015), Government deficit and debt, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/t... [access: 3.08.2015].
 
31.
Falkne, G. and Treib O. (2008), Three World of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 compared to New Member States, „Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 46, issue 2, pp. 293–313.
 
32.
Fawn R. (2013), Visegrad: Fit for purpose?, „Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, Vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 339–349.
 
33.
Foy H. (2015), Kaczynski regains power as conservatives win Polish vote, „Financial Times”, 26 October, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/df00... access: 5.11.2015].
 
34.
Galgoczi B. (2009), Boom and bust in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons on the sustainability of an externally financed growth model, „Journal of Contemporary European Research”, Vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 614–625.
 
35.
Galgoczi B. (2015), The tale of two peripheries in a divided Europe, in: C. Schweiger and J.M. Magone (ed.) The effects of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis: Differentiated integration between the centre and the new peripheries of the EU, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 103–111.
 
36.
Ganev V.I. (2013), Post-Accession Hooliganism: Democratic Governance in Bulgaria and Romania after 2007, „East European Politics and Societies and Cultures”, pp. 26–44.
 
37.
Goetting M. and Sobczak P. (2014), New Polish PM signals cautious approach on euro accession, REUTERS news, 1 October, http://www.reuters.com/article... [access: 3.08.2015].
 
38.
Goetz K.H. (2005), The new member states and the EU: Responding to Europe, in: S. Bulmer, C. Lequesne (ed.), The Member States of the European Union, Oxford: University Press, pp. 254–285. Grabbe H. and Hughes K. (2000), Enlarging the EU eastwards, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
 
39.
Grabbe H. and Barysch K. (2002), Who’s ready for EU enlargement?, London: Centre for European Reform.
 
40.
Handl V. and Paterson W.E. (2013), The continuing relevance of Germany’s engine for CEE and the EU, „Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, Vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 327–337.
 
41.
Hemerijck A. (2014), The Euro-Crisis — Welfare State Conundrum, in: M.J. Rodrigues, E.X. Xiarchogiannopoulou (ed.), The Eurozone crisis and the transformation of EU governance: Internal and external implications, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 137–156.
 
42.
High Level Reflection Group (2013), Central Europe fit for the future: Visegrad Group ten years after EU accession, Bratislava and Warsaw: CEPI and DemosEuropa.
 
43.
Hodson D. (2015), Policy-Making under Economic and Monetary Union: Crisis, Change and Continuity, in: H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack and A.R. Young (ed.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: University Press, pp. 166–196.
 
44.
Kavicky R. (2012), Is V4 Cooperation a Safe Haven in Turbulent Times?, in: A. Gostynska, R. Parkes (ed.) Towards a V4 Position on the Future of Europe, Warsaw: Polish Institute of International Affairs.
 
45.
Koller B. (2014), Unity in a “different way” or the new logic of EU integration: The special focus on the post-enlargement period of ECE countries, in: A. Agh, T. Kaiser, B. Koller (ed.), 10 years after: Multi-level governance and differentiated integration in the EU, Budapest: Blue Ribbon research Centre, pp. 62–83.
 
46.
Kovács O. (2015), Hungary and the eurozone — the need for a more systematic approach, in: C. Schweiger, J.M. Magone (ed.), The Effects of the Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis: Differentiated integration between the Centre and the New Peripheries of the EU, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 127–142.
 
47.
Král D. (2013), Against all, with Britain forever, or just wait and see? The Czech debate on the Eurozone debt crisis, Prague: Institute for European Policy Working Paper.
 
48.
Kvist Jon (2004), Does EU enlargement start a race to the bottom? Strategic interaction among EU member states in social policy, „Journal of European Social Policy”, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 301–318.
 
49.
Lippert B., Hughes K., Grabbe H. and Becker P. (2001), British and German interests in EU enlargement: Conflict and Cooperation, London: Chatham House.
 
50.
Mahony H. (2014), Orban wants to build “illiberal state”, „Euobserver”, 28 July, https://euobserver.com/politic... [access: 4.08. 2015].
 
51.
Meiers F.J. (2015), The Stress Test of German Leadership, „Global Politics and Strategy”, Vol. 57, issue 2, pp. 47–55.
 
52.
Menon A. (2012), Foreign and Defence Policy: The sovereignty obsession and the quest for elusive solidarity, in: Hayward, R. Wurzel (ed.) European disunion: Between sovereignty and solidarity, J. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 165–180.
 
53.
Nowaczek K. (2010), Pressure of migration on social protection systems in the enlarged EU, in: R. Black, G. Engbersen, M. Okólski and C. Pantiru (ed.), A continent moving West? EU enlargement and Labour Migration from Central and Eastern Europe, Amsterdam: University Press, pp. 289–312.
 
54.
Pidd H. (2012), Slovakia rejects multibillion euro bailout, „The Guardian”, 12 October 2012, http://www.theguardian.com/bus... [access: 4.08.2015].
 
55.
Pogatsa Z. (2009), Hungary: From star transition student to backsliding member state, „Journal of Contemporary European Research”, Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 597–613.
 
56.
Sedelmeier U. (2015), Enlargement: Constituent Policy and Tools for External Governance, in: H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack, A.R. Young (ed.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford, University Press.
 
57.
Scharpf F.W. (1998), The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, „Public Administration”, Vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 239–278.
 
58.
Sikorski, R. (2011), Poland and the future of the European Union. Speech delivered in Berlin, 28 November.
 
59.
Sikorski, R. (2013), Address by on the Goals of Polish Foreign Policy in 2013, 20 March. Schimmelfennig F. and Sedelmeier U. (2011), Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe, „Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 661–679.
 
60.
Schweiger C. (2007), Britain, Germany and the Future of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
 
61.
Schweiger C. (2013), Poland, variable geometry and the enlarged European Union, „Europe-Asia Studies”, Vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 394–420.
 
62.
Schweiger C. (2014), The EU and the Global Financial Crisis: New Varieties of Capitalism, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
 
63.
Schweiger C. (2015), The “Reluctant Hegemon”: Germany in the EU’s Post-Crisis Constellation, in: K.N. Demetriou (ed.), The European Union in Crisis: Explorations in Representation and Democratic Legitimacy, London: Springer, pp. 15–32.
 
64.
Sjursen H. and Romsloe B. (2007), Protecting the idea of Europe: France and enlargement, in: H. Sjursen (ed.), Questioning EU Enlargement: Europe in search of identity, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 142–164.
 
65.
Schröder G. (2004), Official government declaration on the EU enlargement, 30 April, http://gerhard-schroeder.de/20... [access: 24.07.2015].
 
66.
Sobczak P. (2013), Polish PM takes gamble by endorsing euro referendum, Reuters news, 26 March, http://www.reuters.com/article... [access: 3.08.2015].
 
67.
Stryjek J. (2013), Economic security aspects of the potential EMU membership of Poland, „Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe”, Vol. 11, issue 5, pp. 47–65.
 
68.
Šuplanta M. (2013), The Visegrad battlegroup: Building new capabilities for the region, Bratislava: Central European Policy Institute policy brief, 17 April, 2013, http://www.cepolicy.org/public... [access: 6.08.2015].
 
69.
Szczerbiak, A. (2012), Poland within the European Union: New awkward partner or new heart of Europe?, London: Routledge.
 
70.
Töró C., Butler E. and Gruber K. (2014), Visegrád: The evolving pattern of coordination and partnership after EU enlargement, „Europe-Asia Studies”, Vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 364–394. V4 Trust (2015), Joint Statement of the Heads of Governments of the Visegrad Group of Countries, Prague, 4 September, http://www.visegradgroup.eu/ca... [access: 5.11.2015].
 
71.
Wiatr J.J. (2013), Poland’s politics and the world crisis, in: A. Agh, L. Vass (ed.) European futures: The perspectives of the new member states in the new Europe, Budapest: College of Communication and Business, pp. 325–337.
 
ISSN:1640-1808