PL EN
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Individual Experiences and Life Satisfaction of Informal Elderly Caregivers in Poland: A Study Based on In-depth Interviews
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Independent researcher
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Klaudyna Szczupak   

Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927, Warszawa, Polska
Data nadesłania: 26-10-2021
Data ostatniej rewizji: 07-12-2021
Data akceptacji: 20-12-2021
Data publikacji: 07-01-2022
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2021;54:68–88
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
The Polish population is aging, generating a huge need for care, which for cultural reasons, and as a result of limited availability of professional care is predominantly the responsibility of family. In order to explore the experiences of informal elderly caregivers in Poland, 20 in-depth interviews were conducted. The aim was to understand what characteristics of the caregiving situation are meaningful for caregiver Subjective Wellbeing (SWB) and what important, valuable beings/doings in terms of the Capability Approach (CA), caretakers cannot achieve because of their caretaking role. The study also aims at exploring what public policy tools/measures are perceived as those that could positively affect SWB. The results show that, the subjective evaluation of SWB is not only highly related to factors such as burden of care, characteristics of the care recipient, caregiver support and/or time spent caring but also on limitations that caregiving imposes on the ability to achieve valued functionings. Furthermore, while many characteristics of the caretaking situation are perceived by caregivers as negatively affecting their SWB there are also aspects which can increase their SWB. Finally, people have preferences when it comes to the types of help they want and these preferences are dependent on their individual situations.
 
REFERENCJE (32)
1.
Bakalarczyk, R. (2018). Polityka wsparcia nieformalnych opiekunów niesamodzielnych osób starszych. Na podstawie zmian prawnych w latach 2003–2015. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
2.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
 
3.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
 
4.
European Commission. (2015). The Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 European Member States (2013–2060), European Economy 3.
 
5.
Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world. Oxford University Press.
 
6.
Grochowska, J. (2014). Feeling of satisfaction and being burdened with duties among informal care givers of the elderly according to the level of efficacy of care recipients. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu, 20(1), 46–50.
 
7.
Hajek, A. & Konig, H. H. (2016). Informal Caregiving and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence of a Population-Based Longitudinal Study of Older Adults in Germany. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(4), 300–305.
 
8.
Katz, S., Down, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970) Progress in the development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10(1), 20–30.
 
9.
Kurowska, A. (2018). (De)familialization and (De)genderization — competing or complementary perspectives in comparative policy analysis? Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 29–49.
 
10.
Krzyżowski, Ł. (2011). In the Trap of Intergenerational Solidarity: Family Care in Poland’s Ageing Society. Polish Sociological Review, 1(73), 55–78.
 
11.
Lawton, M. P. & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.
 
12.
Lacey, R. E., McMunn, A., & Webb, E. (2018). Informal caregiving patterns and trajectories of psychological distress in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Psychological Medicine, 1(9).
 
13.
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism. The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.
 
14.
Li, Y. (2016). Social mobility, social network and subjective well-being in the UK. Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 11(2–3), 222–237.
 
15.
Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(3), 1–20.
 
16.
Niimi, Y. (2016). The “Cost” of informal care: an analysis of the impact of elderly care on caregivers’ subjective well-being in Japan. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(4), 779–810.
 
17.
O’Neill, G. & Ross, M. M (1991). Burden of Care: An important Concept for Nurses. Health Care Women Int., 12(1), 111–121.
 
18.
Perek-Białas, J. & Stypińska, J. (2010). Łączenie pracy i opieki nad osobą starszą — wpływ na jakość życia opiekuna. In D. Kałuża, P. Szukalski (red.), Jakość życia seniorów w XXI wieku. Ku Aktywności. (136–148). Uniwersytet Łódzki.
 
19.
Pot, A. M. Deeg, D. J. H., & Van Dyck, R. (1997). Psychological well-being of informal caregivers of elderly people with dementia: Changes over time. Aging & Mental Health, 1(3), 261–268.
 
20.
Quinn, C., Clare, L., & Wood,s R. T. (2010). The impact of motivations and meanings on the wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(1), 43–55.
 
21.
Rafnsson, S. B., Shankar, A., & Steptoe, A. (2017). Informal caregiving transitions, subjective well-being and depressed mood: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Aging and Mental Health, 21(1), 104–111.
 
22.
Robeyns, I. (2006). The Capability Approach in Practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.
 
23.
Saraceno, C. & Keck, W. (2010). Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12, 675–696.
 
24.
Sen, A. (1983). Poor, Relatively Speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–169.
 
25.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Knopf.
 
26.
Shakeel, S., Rana, S. A., & Malik, N. I. (2015). Burden of Care, Mental Health and Subjective Well Being of Family Caregivers of Elderly Patients. Pakistan Journal of Professional Psychologists, 6(1), 1–16.
 
27.
Ślusarska, B., Bartoszek, A., Kocka, K., Deluga, A., Chrzan-Rosak, A., & Nowicki, G. (2019). Quality of life predictors in informal caregivers of seniors with a functional performance deficit — an example of home care in Poland. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 14, 889–903.
 
28.
Stojak, Z., Jamiołkowski, J., Chlabicz, S., & Marcinowicz, L. (2019). Levels of Satisfaction, Workload Stress and Support Amongst Informal Caregivers of Patients Receiving or Not Receiving Long-Term Home Nursing Care in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1189–1198.
 
29.
Verbakel, E., Metzelthin, S. F., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2018). Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers’ Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 14: 73(6), 1099–1111.
 
30.
Van den Berg, B., Fiebig, D. G., & Hall, J. (2014). Well-being losses due to care-giving. Journal of Health Economics, 35(100), 123–131.
 
31.
Wang, X. (2014). Subjective well-being associated with size of social network and social support of elderly. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(6), 1037–1042.
 
32.
Wizner, B., Skalska, A., Klich-Rączka, A., Piotrowicz, K., Grodzicki,T. (2012) Stan zdrowia i sprawność osób starszych. In M. Mossakowska, A. Więcek, P. Błędowski (red.), PolSenior. Aspekty medyczne, psychologiczne i ekonomiczne starzenia się ludzi w Polsce. (82–83).Termedia.
 
ISSN:1640-1808