The case for an extended understanding of the migration state: Regulating migration in Turkey
Center for Intercultural Communication, VID Specialized University, Norway
Data nadesłania: 13-03-2023
Data ostatniej rewizji: 09-10-2023
Data akceptacji: 21-10-2023
Data publikacji online: 04-12-2023
Data publikacji: 04-12-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Meltem Yilmaz Sener   

Center for Intercultural Communication, VID Specialized University, Misjonsmarka 12, 4024, Stavanger, Norway
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2023;63(4):1-14
Migration state can be a very useful analytical tool for analyzing how states regulate international migration, and for comparing the practices of different states in this realm. However, we need an extended understanding of the notion of migration state to include the regulation functions of the developing country states for international migration and to reflect on the historical changes with respect to these regulation functions which take place in parallel with the changes in the economic and geo-political position of the countries. This paper starts with a discussion of Hollifield’s conceptualization of the migration state, reflecting on its existing assumptions. Hollifield’s conceptualization is reviewed critically especially based on the criticisms in Adamson & Tsourapas (2020) and Tsourapas (2020). While the paper benefits from the typology of nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal migration management regimes in Adamson & Tsourapas (2020), the importance of having a temporal perspective is emphasized which is lacking in this study. Rather than looking at these three types (nationalizing, developmental, neoliberal) as existing in different contexts, the paper focuses on the shift from one type to the other in the case of a single country. The paper demonstrates how the migration state in Turkey has gone through transformations during the period from the foundation of the Republic until today. The paper then discusses the implications of this focus on Turkey for a revised and extended understanding of the concept of the migration state.
Abadan-Unat, N. (1995). Turkish migration to Europe. The Cambridge survey of world migration, 279-284.
Abadan-Unat, N. (1976). Turkish Migration to Europe (1960-1975): A Balance Sheet of Achievements and Failures. In Turkish Workers in Europe, 1960-1975 (pp. 1-44). Brill.
Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2020). The migration state in the global south: Nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal models of migration management. International Migration Review, 54(3), 853-882.
Akgündüz, A. (1998). Migration to and from Turkey, 1783–1960: Types, numbers and ethno‐religious dimensions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(1), 97-120.
Aydemir, N. (2022). Framing Syrian refugees in Turkish politics: a qualitative analysis on party group speeches. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-19.
Batalla Adam, L. (2017). The EU-Turkey deal one year on: A delicate balancing act. The International Spectator, 52(4), 44-58.
Düvell, F. (2014). International Relations and Migration Management: The Case of Turkey. Insight Turkey, 16(1).
Gunduz, L., Genc, I. H., & Aysan, A. F. (2022). Buying citizenship: A boon to district-level house prices in Istanbul. Housing Policy Debate, 1-16.
Haferlach, L., & Kurban, D. (2017). Lessons learnt from the EU‐Turkey refugee agreement in guiding EU migration partnerships with origin and transit countries. Global Policy, 8, 85-93.
Heck, G., & Hess, S. (2017). Tracing the effects of the EU-Turkey Deal. Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 3(2), 35-56.
Hollifield, J. F., & Orlando Sharpe, M. (2017). Japan as an ‘emerging migration state’. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17(3), 371-400.
Hollifield, J. F., Hunt, V. F., & Tichenor, D. J. (2008). Immigrants, markets, and rights: The United States as an emerging migration state. Immigr. & Nat'lity L. Rev., 29, 341.
Hollifield, J. F. (2004). The emerging migration state 1. International Migration Review, 38(3), 885-912.
Hollifield, J. F. (1992). Migration and international relations: Cooperation and control in the European Community. International Migration Review, 26(2), 568-595.
İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2013). Turkish migration policies: A critical historical retrospective. Perceptions: Journal of international affairs, 18(3), 167-190.
Kilic, H., & Biffl, G. (2022). Turkish migration policy from the 1960s until today: What national development plans tell us. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 23(4), 2047-2073.
Kirişçi, K. (2000). Disaggregating Turkish citizenship and immigration practices. Middle Eastern Studies, 36(3), 1-22.
Kolluoğlu, B. (2013). Excesses of nationalism: Greco‐Turkish population exchange. Nations and nationalism, 19(3), 532-550.
Martin, P. L. (1991). The unfinished story: Turkish labour migration to Western Europe: with special reference to the Federal Republic of Germany (Vol. 84). International Labour Organization.
Mavelli, L. (2018). Citizenship for sale and the neoliberal political economy of belonging. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 482-493.
Natter, K. (2018). Rethinking immigration policy theory beyond ‘Western liberal democracies’. Comparative migration studies, 6(1), 1-21.
Ong, A. (2006). Mutations in citizenship. Theory, culture & society, 23(2-3), 499-505.
Paine, S. (1974). Exporting workers: the Turkish case (Vol. 41). Cambridge University Press.
Parker, O. (2017). Commercializing citizenship in crisis EU: The case of immigrant investor programmes. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 332-348.
Penninx, R. (1982). A critical review of theory and practice: the case of Turkey. International Migration Review, 16(4), 781-818.
Sadiq, K., & Tsourapas, G. (2021). The postcolonial migration state. European Journal of International Relations, 27(3), 884-912.
Sari, O. L. (2003). Migration and Development: the case of Turkish migration to Germany. International Journal of Economic Development, 5(2).
Sayari, S. (1986). Migration policies of sending countries: perspectives on the Turkish experience. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485(1), 87-97.
Seker, N. (2013). Forced population movements in the ottoman empire and the early Turkish republic: an attempt at reassessment through demographic engineering. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, (16).
Shachar, A. & R. Hirschl. (2014). On Citizenship, States, and Markets. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22 (2): 231–257.
Shields, S. (2016). Forced migration as nation-building: The league of nations, minority protection, and the Greek-Turkish population exchange. Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d'histoire du droit international, 18(1), 120-145.
Sirkeci, I., Cohen, J. H., & Yazgan, P. (2012). Turkish culture of migration: Flows between Turkey and Germany, socio-economic development and conflict. Migration Letters, 9(1), 33-46.
Sparke, M. B. (2006). A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border. Political geography, 25(2), 151-180.
Straubhaar, T. (1986). The causes of international labor migrations—A demand-determined approach. International Migration Review, 20(4), 835-855.
Surak, K. (2021a). Millionaire mobility and the sale of citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(1), 166-189.
Surak, K. (2021b). Marketizing sovereign prerogatives: how to sell citizenship. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 62(2), 275-308.
Tanasoca, A. (2016). Citizenship for sale: Neomedieval, not just neoliberal? European Journal of Sociology/Archives européennes de sociologie, 57(1), 169-195.
Tsourapas, G. (2020). The long arm of the Arab state. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(2), 351-370.
Utku, D. E., & Sirkeci, İ. (2020). Ethics of commodified (golden) citizenship. Journal of Economy, Culture, and Society, (62), 365-380.
Yildirim, O. (2007). Diplomacy and displacement: reconsidering the Turco-Greek exchange of populations, 1922–1934. Routledge.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top