STUDIA
Konsekwencje społeczne planu ożywienia gospodarczego George’a W. Busha
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Instytut Ekonomii, Kalamazoo College, USA
2
Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Arkansas, USA
3
Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Łódzki
Data publikacji: 05-06-2020
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2004;7:89–101
 
STRESZCZENIE ARTYKUŁU
We analyzed social and economic results of the tax reform implemented by George W. Bush administration. First we described two stages of that process in 2001 and 2003. Then tables with tax rates cross taxpayers categories were presented. We showed also points and arguments of supporters and opponents of the reform. From the republican point of view main goal of the tax exemptions was strict economic i.e. accelerating growth of the economy and increasing of the tax revenues in the longer run. Reform opponents and democratic experts maintained that it serves interests of the rich, decrease tax revenues with cuts in social spending and grows up of the social inequality. We use official and other sources of data.
 
REFERENCJE (13)
1.
Citizens for Tax Justice. 2003a. Bush 2003 Tax Plan a Big Fat Zero for a Third of Nation's Taxpayers: Percentages with no tax cut are much higher in poorer states. Styczeń 27. http://www.ctj.org/html/gwb010.... 2003b. Bush Dividend Tax Cut Worthless to Most Seniors. Marzec 13. http://www.ctj.org/html/diveld....
 
2.
Crippen, Dan L. „Letter to the Honorable Kent Conrad and John M. Spratt Jr. regarding estimated costs of a potential conflict with Iraq", http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm... 822&sequence=0.
 
3.
"The Dynamic CBO." 2003. Wall Street Journal, Kwiecień 3, p A. 14.
 
4.
"A flood of red ink - America's deficits”, Special Report, Economist, listopad 8 2003.
 
5.
Friedman, Joel and Robert Greenstein. 2003. Exempting Corporate Dividends From Individual Income Taxes. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, styczeń 11. http://www.cbpp.org/l-6-03tax.....
 
6.
Friedman, Milton. 2003. „What Every American Wants." Wall Street Journal, styczeń 15, p A .10.
 
7.
National Center for Policy Analysis. 2001. Tax Issues, http://www.ncpa.org/pi/taxes/p....
 
8.
Reynolds, Alan. 2001. „Tax Cut 2001: A little Bang for a lot of Buck." Cato Institute.
 
9.
The Congressioanl Budget Office. March 2003. An Analysis of the President's Budgetary.
 
10.
Proposals fo r Fiscal Year 2004. http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm....
 
11.
The Congressional Budget Office. May 2001. Historical Effective Tax Rates, 1979-1997. Preliminary Edition. ftp://ftp.cbo.gov/28xx/doc2838/Histo....
 
12.
The White House, styczeń 2003. President Bush Taking Action to Strengthen America's Economy, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news....
 
13.
Wolk, Martin. 2003. What Bush's plan means fo r you. MSNBC. http://www.msnbc.com/news/8561... .asp?cp 1=1.
 
ISSN:1640-1808