PRACA ORYGINALNA
Implementing innovations in the context of the declared and actual readiness to change of social assistance workers
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Centre for Family Research Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń,
Data publikacji: 01-10-2020
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2020;49:85–100
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE ARTYKUŁU
Contemporary society around the world is highly volatile and therefore any support system that responds to the real needs of people must be constantly evolving. As a result, new and innovative solutions appear in the social welfare system. However, the analysis of public policies and programs shows that many good ideas are not implemented in the daily work of employees who directly support clients. There is a resistance on their part to novelty and their openness to the implementation of new concepts is limited. The aim of the article is to analyze the phenomenon of openness to change. The study was conducted on a group of 186 social welfare workers (132 social workers and 54 family assistants). Two research categories were adopted: declared and actual openness to change. The results of the study showed that social assistance workers declare a high level of openness to change, but their measured level of real openness is actually low. Although employees declare great support for new solutions, they do, in fact, have very low tolerance for uncertainty and the ability to take risks, which is inherent in the implementation of innovations. Thus, a gap arises between the declared and actual value. This discovery is crucial for the successful implementation of innovations and may be one of the more important obstacles to its realization. It is necessary to change the current approach and broaden the activities preparing for implementation of new solutions so that the actual readiness to change of employees is at a sufficient level.
 
REFERENCJE (35)
1.
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488....
 
2.
Akin, B. A. (2016). Practitioner views on the core functions of coaching in the implementation of an evidence-based intervention in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chil....
 
3.
Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford University Press.
 
4.
Claiborne, N., Auerbach, C., Lawrence, C., & Schudrich, W. Z. (2013). Organizational change: The role of climate and job satisfaction in child welfare workers’ perception of readiness to change. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2013–2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chil....
 
5.
Czechowska-Bieluga, M. (2018). Inicjowanie zmian w diadzie pracownik socjalny — Klient [Initiating change in the social worker – client dyad]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia, 30(4), 75. https://doi.org/10.17951/j.201....
 
6.
Czechowska-Bieluga, M. (2019). Polish Social Workers, Positive Orientation and Their Readiness to Change. SABIEDRĪBA. INTEGRĀCIJA. IZGLĪTĪBA, 159, 159.
 
7.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406.
 
8.
Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973....
 
9.
Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core Implementation Components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973....
 
10.
Foxon, T., Makuch, Z., Mata, M., & Pearson, P. J. (2004). Towards a sustainable innovation policy — Institutional structures, stakeholder participation and mixes of policy instruments.
 
11.
Gibson, M. (2014). Social Worker Shame in Child and Family Social Work: Inadequacy, Failure, and the Struggle to Practise Humanely. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(4), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/026505....
 
12.
Hoorens, V. (1993). Self-enhancement and Superiority Biases in Social Comparison. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/147927....
 
13.
Jordan, P., & Skrzypczak, B. (2002). Centrum Aktywności Lokalnej jako metoda rozwoju społeczności lokalnej [The Local Activity Centre as a method of community development]. Biuro Obsługi Ruchu Inicjatyw Społecznych BORIS.
 
14.
Kaczmarek, M. (2005). Zmiana paradygmatu w opiece zastępczej. Uwagi do stanu reformy [A paradigm shift in foster care. Remarks on the state of reform]. In M. Racław-Markowska (ed.), Pomoc dzieciom i rodzinie w środowisku lokalnym. Debata o nowym systemie [Help for children and family in the local environment. Debate about the new system]. Public Affairs Institute.
 
15.
Kłos, L., & Leśniewska, G. (2018). Gotowość do zmiany pracowników socjalnych [Readiness to change in social workers]. Edukacja Humanistyczna, 2, 95–104.
 
16.
Kriegel, R. J., & Brandt, D. (1996). Sacred cows make the best burgers: Developing change-ready people and organizations. Warner Books.
 
17.
Leykum, L. K., Pugh, J. A., Lanham, H. J., Harmon, J., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). Implementation research design: Integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implementation Science, 4(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5....
 
18.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary expanded ed). Russell Sage Foundation.
 
19.
Necel, R. (2016). Orientacja innowacyjna pracownika socjalnego — teoretyczne perspektywy i determinanty rozwoju [Innovative orientation of the social worker — theoretical perspectives and determinants of development]. In A. Kotlarska-Michalska & P. Nosal (eds.), Zaradność społeczna: Współczesne przejawy i ograniczenia [Social resourcefulness: Contemporary manifestations and constraints]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
 
20.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1985). The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044....
 
21.
O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2008). Applying innovation. Sage publications.
 
22.
Paszkowska-Rogacz, A., & Tarkowska, M. (2004). Metody pracy z grupą w poradnictwie zawodowym [Methods of group work in vocational guidance]. Krajowy Ośrodek Wspierania Edukacji Zawodowej i Ustawicznej.
 
23.
Penc, J. (2000). Sprawne kierowanie zmianami [Efficient change management]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia, 34, 185–195.
 
24.
Phills Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
 
25.
Przeperski, J. (2015). Konferencja Grupy Rodzinnej w teorii i praktyce pracy socjalnej z rodziną [Family Group Conference in the theory and practice of social work with the family]. Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne Akapit.
 
26.
Przeperski, J. (2019). Badania współczesnej rodziny w kontekście tworzenia polityk publicznych opartych na wiedzy i dowodach naukowych [Research on the contemporary family in the context of creating knowledge and evidence-based public policies]. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości.
 
27.
Przeperski, J. (2020). Social Work Education in Poland. In S. M. Sajid, R. Baikady, C. Sheng-Li, & H. Sakaguchi (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
 
28.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
 
29.
Rønning, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). Innovation in social welfare and human services. Routledge, Taylor Francis Group.
 
30.
Supplee, L. H., & Metz, A. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges in Evidence-based Social Policy. Social Policy Report, 28(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379....
 
31.
Szczepkowski, J. (2010). Praca socjalna, podejście skoncentrowane na rozwiązaniach [Social work, solution-focused approach]. Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne “Akapit”.
 
32.
Taylor, B. J. (2017). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work (3rd edition). Sage, Learning Matters.
 
33.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
34.
Webb, S. A. (2006). Social work in a risk society: Social and political perspectives. Macmillan International Higher Education.
 
35.
Wódz, K., & Pawlas-Czyż, S. (2008). Praca socjalna wobec nowych obszarów wykluczenia społecznego: Modele teoretyczne, potrzeby praktyki [Social work in new areas of social exclusion: Theoretical models, needs of practice]. Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne “Akapit”.
 
ISSN:1640-1808