STUDIA
Defined contribution pensions: challenges for members and policy makers
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Organisation of Pension Supervisors (IOPS)
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Dariusz Stańko   

Financial Affairs Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, OECD, 2 rue André Pascal, 75775 Paris, CEDEX 16, France; author’s email address: dariusz.stanko@oecd.org
Data publikacji: 22-05-2020
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2017;39:13–26
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
Wzrastająca rola konstrukcji emerytalnych o zdefiniowanej składce (DC) oznacza, że coraz więcej osób jest narażonych na różne ryzyka emerytalne. Co więcej, rozwiązania typu DC nie są wolne od istotnych wad. Celem artykułu jest przedyskutowanie podstawowych wyzwań, przed jakimi stoją członkowie takich planów emerytalnych oraz decydenci, a także krótkie przedstawienie możliwych rozwiązań.
 
REFERENCJE (29)
1.
Antolin, P., Fuentes, O. (2012). Communicating Pension Risk to DC Plan Members: The Chilean Case of a Pension Risk Simulator. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions. No. 28. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
2.
Basak, S., Makarov, D. (2014). Strategic Asset Allocation in Money Management. Journal of Finance. Vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 179–217.
 
3.
Berstein, S., Fuentes, O., Torrealba, N. (2010). In an Individually Funded Pension System: How Can Risks Be Mitigated? Superintendencia de Pensiones Working Papers Series. No. 346.
 
4.
Blake, D. (2006). Pension Economics. Chichester: John Wiley.
 
5.
Blake, D., Cairns, A.J.C., Dowd, K. (2008). Turning Pension Plans into Pension Planes: What Investment Strategy Designers of Defined Contribution Pension Plans can Learn from Commercial Aircraft. Pensions Institute Discussion Paper PI-0806. London: Cass Business School.
 
6.
Chłoń-Domińczak, A., Kawiński, M., Stańko, D. (2013). System oceny i prezentacji wyników inwestycyjnych kapitałowych systemów emerytalnych. Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa — Oficyna Wydawnicza.
 
7.
Castañeda, P., Rudolph, H.P. (2011). Upgrading Investment Regulations in Second Pillar Pension Systems: A Proposal for Colombia. Policy Research Working Paper. August, no. 5775. Washington: The World Bank.
 
8.
EIOPA (2013a). Survey of EU Practice on Default Investment Options. Frankfurt: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.
 
9.
EIOPA (2013b). Good Practices on Information Provision for DC Schemes. Frankfurt: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.
 
10.
Impavido, G., Lasagabaster, E., Garcia-Huitron, M. (2010). New Policies for Defined Contribution Pensions: Industrial Organisation Models and Investment Products. Washington: The World Bank.
 
11.
Kawiński, M., Stańko, D., Rutecka, J. (2012). Protection Mechanisms in the Old-age Pension Systems of the CEE Countries. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 581–605.
 
12.
Kawiński, M., Stańko, D. (2009). Problem akwizycji w systemie emerytalnym. Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe. Vol. 2, pp. 108–114.
 
13.
Lord Hutton of Furness (2012). Defined Ambition a Chance to Rethink the Future of DC, in Defining Ambition: Views from the Industry on Achieving Risk Sharing, National Association of Pension Funds. London: National Association of Pension Funds.
 
14.
NEST (2010). Understanding Reactions to Volatility and Loss. London: National Employment Savings Trust.
 
15.
OECD (2017). OECD Pensions Outlook 2016; chapter 1: The Changing Pensions Landscape. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
16.
OECD (2016). OECD Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
17.
OECD (2012a). OECD Pensions Outlook 2012; chapter 6: A Policy Roadmap for Defined Contribution Pensions. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
18.
OECD (2012b). OECD Roadmap for the Good Design of Defined Contribution Pension Plans. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
19.
OECD (2011). Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
20.
Opazo, L., Raddatz, C., Schmukler, S.L. (2010). The Long and the Short of Emerging Market Debt. Superintendencia de Pensiones Working Papers Series, No. 42.
 
21.
Paklina, N. (2016). The Role of Supervision Related to Consumer Protection in Private Pension Systems. IOPS Working Papers on Effective Pensions Supervision. No. 27.
 
22.
Randle, T., Rudolph, H.P. (2014). Pension Risk and Risk-Based Supervision in Defined Contribution Pension Funds. The Policy Research Working Paper. No. 6813.
 
23.
Stańko, D. (2015). The Concept of Target Retirement Income: Supervisory Challenges. IOPS Working Papers on Effective Pensions Supervision. No. 25.
 
24.
Stańko, D. (2013). Metody ograniczania ryzyka inwestycyjnego w procesie oszczędzania na emeryturę. Prace Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Gdańsku. Vol. 28, pp. 331–344.
 
25.
Stańko, D. (2010). Transfery członków kapitałowych funduszy emerytalnych na przykładzie polskiego rynku OFE. Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe. No. 8 (1), pp. 7–36.
 
26.
Stewart, F. (2014). Proving Incentives for Long-Term Investment by Pension Funds The Use of Outcome-based Benchmarks. Policy Research Working Paper. No. 6885.
 
27.
Valdes-Prieto, S. (2008). A Theory of Contribution Density and Implications for Pension Design. Social Protection & Labor Discussion Papers, No. 0828, Washington: The World Bank.
 
28.
Walker, E. (2009). Risk and Pensions. In: Investments and Payouts in Funded Pension Systems. Santiago: International Federation of Pension Fund Administrators (FIAP).
 
29.
Zwecher, M.J. (2010). Retirement Portfolios: Theory, Construction, and Management. Hoboken–Chichester: John Wiley.
 
ISSN:1640-1808