PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
A critical look at migration and security within the framework of the Aberystwyth School: the case of Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
International Relations and Security Department, Social Science, Selçuk University, Turkey
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2023-06-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-09-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-09-29
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-01-05
 
 
Publication date: 2024-01-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Ozan Sabri Tuncer   

International Relations and Security Department, Social Science, Samlaraltı Street, 20100, Denizli, Turkey
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The problem of migration, which affects the international conjuncture and has been mentioned frequently in the literature in recent years, has become a more effective problem today. Migration has become a major security problem not only for the receiving country, but also for the sending countries. While the states acted with the classical sense of security with the 1648 Westphalia system, they were especially critical approaches wanted to change this perception. Aberystwyth school, one of the critical theories, also argues that this perception should be changed. According to this school, instead of a rigid border and military security, the changing and deepening security problems should also be addressed required. The immigration problem, which became more prominent in the international conjuncture, especially after the Syrian civil war, proves critical security theories. Recently, based on the example of Poland after the Russia-Ukraine crisis, the security problems created by the immigrant problem in Europe were tried to be explained. Thus, by referring to the Aberystwyth school principles on Ukrainian immigrants, a diversified security perspective was referred.
 
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Akyeşilmen, N. (2012). Are Human Rights Violations a Threat to Human Security? Human Security: Threats, Risks, and Crises International Human Security Conference Series 18-19, (pp. 81-82 ) CPRS. Turkey.
 
2.
Bılgın, P. (2008). Critical Theory. Paul D. Williams (Der.), Security Studies: An Introduction, (pp. 89-102), Londra Routledge.
 
3.
Bılgın, P. (2010). New Approaches On Securıty Studıes: New Securıty Studıes, Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(14), pp. 69-96.
 
4.
Bilan, Y. (2017). Migration of the Ukrainian Population: Economic, Institutional and Sociocultural Factors, Ubiquity Press.
 
5.
Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation, Review of International Studies, 17(4), 318-320.
 
6.
Booth, K. (2005). Critical Security Studies and World Politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
 
7.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge University Press.
 
8.
Bulut, Y., Akın, S., (2020). Yerel, Ulusal ve Küresel Boyutlarıyla Göç ve Mülteci Sorunu, Çizgi Kitapevi.
 
9.
Buzan, B. (2008). Askeri Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5(18), 107-123.
 
10.
Cénat, J. M., Darius, W. P., Noorishad, P. etc., (2022). War in Ukraine and Racism: The Physical and Mental Health of Refugees of Color Matters, Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 67, 1-5.
 
11.
Dogan N. & Surum R. etc., (2022). İstanbul Göç Araştırması, İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Basın Evi.
 
12.
Duszczyk, M. & Kaczmarczyk, P. (2022). The War in Ukraine and Migration to Poland: Outlook and Challenges, Intereconomics, 57(3), pp. 164-170.
 
13.
Eralıev, S. (2018). Securitized Migration: Russian Policies in Dealing with Labour Migrants from Central Asia, PhD Thesies, University of Tsukuba.
 
14.
Hatap, F. & Yeltin, H. (2022). Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi Bağlamında Avrupa Birliği’nin Belarus Göçmen Krizine Yaklaşımı, Uluslararası Eşitlik Politikası Dergisi 1(2), 99-117.
 
15.
Kolası, K. (2013). Eleştirel Teori Ve Güvenlik: Kimin İçin Güvenlik?, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 121-154.
 
16.
Kocak O. (2016). The Evaluatıonof The Expectatıons Of The Students Towards Workıng Lıfe, Yalova Social Science Journal, 66-91.
 
17.
Kucuk, M. N., (2021). Göç-Güvenlik Bağlantısını Yeniden Düşünmek: Eleştirel Güvenlik Yaklaşımları, Özgürleşme ve Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Mülteciler, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 18(69), pp. 3-28.
 
18.
Lykoyannis, Y. (2015). EU’s immigration policy for the Black Sea region: FRONTEX and the securitization of immigration, Unpublished Master Thesies, International Hellenic University School Of Humanities Black Sea Cultural Studies.
 
19.
Mandacı, N. & Özerim, G. (2013). Uluslararası Göçlerin Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü: Avrupa’da Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10(39), pp. 105-130.
 
20.
Mandacı, N. & Özerim, M. G. (2013). Uluslararası Göçlerin Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü: Avrupa’da Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10(39) pp. 105-130.
 
21.
Memiş, H. (2015). İç Savaş Nedeniyle Kilis’te Yaşayan Suriyelilerin Oluşturduğu Sosyo- Ekonomik Algılar Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52): 100-110.
 
22.
Mis, N. (2012). Securitization Theory and Politics of Securitization in Turkey: 1923-2003, Unpublished PhD Thesies, Sakarya University Journal of Social Science.
 
23.
Miş, N. Securitization Theory and Securitization of the Political, pp. 345-381.
 
24.
Oancă, A. (2022). Security’ and ‘Crisis’ in Populist Discourse -a Brief Exploratory Study, Relatıones Internatıonales, Audrı, 15(1), 7-27.
 
25.
Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2021). Critical Security Studies. Taylor & Francis Group.
 
26.
Perkowska, M. (2020.) Polish Response to Irregular Migration in Recent Years La respuesta polaca contemporánea a la inmigración irregular, Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 18(2), pp. 1-33.
 
27.
Sandıklı, A. & Emeklier, B. (2011). Güvenlik Yaklaşımlarında Değişim ve Dönüşüm, Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies BILGESAM, https://www.academia.edu/35496....
 
28.
Sen, G. (2017). Uluslararası Göçün Sağlık Güvenliğine Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Suriye Göçü Örneği, 2nd International Health Sciences and Life Congress, (pp. 180-190). İletişim Yayınları.
 
29.
Simsek, D.& Icduydu, A. (2017). Uluslararası Göç, Politika ve Güvenlik, Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, (pp. 6-11). İletişim Yayınları.
 
30.
Tıcu, I. (2021). Migration as a (Non)Traditional Security Issue of the Risk Society , Postmodern Openings, Postmodern Opennings, 12(2), pp. 387-409.
 
31.
Turgay, S. (2021). Avrupa Birliği’nin Göçü Güvenlikleştirme Politikasında Frontex’in Rolü, Journal of Internatıonal relations and political Science Studies, pp. 5-26.
 
32.
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2022). Ukraine: Situation Report - Last updated, https://reports.unocha.org/en/....
 
33.
UNODC, (2018). Countering Trafficking in Persons in Conflict Situations: Thematic Paper, www.unodc.org/documents/humantrafficking/2018/1708776_ebookCountering_Trafficking_in _Persons_in_Conflict_Situations.pdf)[08.10.2022].
 
34.
UNODC, (2018). Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict, www.unodc.org/documents/data-andanalysis/glotip/2018/GloTIP2018_BOOKLET_2_Conflict.pdf.
 
35.
Walt, Stephen (1991) ‘The Renaissance of Security Studies’, International Studies Quarterly.
 
36.
Wagnsson, C., Hellman, M., Holmberg, A. (2010). The Centrality of Non-traditional Groups for Security in the Globalized Era: The Case of Children, International Political Sociology, 4, pp. 1-14.
 
37.
WHO, (2022). Ukraine Crisis Public Health Situation Analysis – Refugee-hosting countries, https://apps.who.int/iris/bits....
 
ISSN:1640-1808
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top