PL EN
Familial pragmatism: modern families navigating the private/public junction
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Social Sciences, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Sociology, University of Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-10-27
 
 
Publication date: 2023-10-27
 
 
Corresponding author
Paula Pustułka   

SWPS University, ul. Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815, Warsaw
 
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2023;61(2):1-10
 
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Attwell, K., Leask, J., Meyer, S. B., Rokkas & P., Ward, P. (2017). Vaccine rejecting parents’ engagement with expert systems that inform vaccination programs. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 14(1): 65-76.
 
2.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
 
3.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E, (2013). Distant love. John Wiley & Sons.
 
4.
Bridges K. (2011). Privacy Rights and Public Families, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 113:11-39.
 
5.
Pustulka, P. & Buler, M. (2022). First-time motherhood and intergenerational solidarities during COVID-19. Journal of Family Research, 34(1): 16-40.
 
6.
Chang, K. S. (1997). Modernity through the family: Familial foundations of Korean society. International Review of Sociology, 7(1): 51-63.
 
7.
Dahl, G. B., Kostøl, A. R. & Mogstad, M. (2014). Family welfare cultures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1711-1752.
 
8.
Foucault, M, (1998). Nadzorować i karać. Narodziny więzienia, przeł. T. Komendant. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
 
9.
Foucault, M. (2000), Seksualność i władza (in:) Filozofia, historia, polityka. Wybór pism, przeł. D. Leszczyński, L. Rasiński. Warszawa-Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
10.
Gattrell, C. (2005) Hard Labour: The Sociology of Parenthood. McGraw-Hill Education.
 
11.
Gawrońska, M. & Sikorska M. (2022). Rodziny na widoku – koncepcja demonstrowania rodzinności jako narzędzie użyteczne do analizowania życia rodzinnego. Studia Socjologiczne (244): 137–164.
 
12.
Giza-Poleszczuk, A. (2005). Rodzina a system społeczny. Reprodukcja i kooperacja w perspektywie interdyscyplinarnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
13.
Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation. New York.
 
14.
Hao, L. (2003). Private support and public assistance for immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 36-51.
 
15.
Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters. Responding to family change in Europe. Bristol: Polity Press.
 
16.
Hartman, A. (1996). Social policy as a context for lesbian and gay families: The political is personal. In J. Laird & R.-J. Green (Eds.), Lesbians and gays in couples and families: A handbook for therapists (pp. 69–85). Jossey-Bass.
 
17.
Hardyment C. (2007) Dream babies: childcare advice from John Locke to Gina Ford. London, UK: Francis Lincoln Publishers.
 
18.
Hefner, V. & Wilson, B.J. (2013). From love at first sight to soul mate: The influence of romantic ideals in popular films on young people's beliefs about relationships. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 150-175.
 
19.
Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
 
20.
Kotowska, I.E. (2019). Uwagi o urodzeniach i niskiej dzietności w Polsce oraz polityce rodzinnej wspierającej prokreację. Studia Demograficzne 2(176): 11-29.
 
21.
Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. Basic Books, Inc.
 
22.
Lee E. (2014) Experts and parenting culture. In: Lee et al. (eds) Parenting culture studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51–75.
 
23.
Meardi, G. & Guardiancich, I. (2022). Back to the familialist future: the rise of social policy for ruling populist radical right parties in Italy and Poland. West European Politics, 45(1): 129-153.
 
24.
Miller T. (2005). Making Sense of Motherhood: A Narrative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
25.
Morgan D.H.J. (1996). Family Connections. Cambridge: Polity Press.
 
26.
Morgan D.H.J. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
 
27.
Peltola, P., Milkie, M. A. & Presser, S. (2004). The “feminist” mystique: Feminist identity in three generations of women. Gender and Society, 18(1): 122-144.
 
28.
Pfeffer, C. A. (2012). Normative resistance and inventive pragmatism: Negotiating structure and agency in transgender families. Gender and Society, 26(4): 574-602.
 
29.
Psarras, E., Stein, K. & Shah, P. (2023). “You’re not here for the right reasons!” From The Bachelorette to Instagram Influencer. Feminist Media Studies, 23(2): 571-587.
 
30.
Pustulka, P. (2023). ‘Since Having a Child, I Finally Feel Like an Adult’: Exploring Intersections of Contemporary Transitions-To-Motherhood and Transitions-To-Adulthood. Emerging Adulthood 11(3): 581-596.
 
31.
Radzińska, J. & Pustułka, P. (2022). Pandemiczne święta: typologia postaw Polek i Polaków wobec zmian w praktykach rodzinnych w kryzysie w świetle danych jakościowych. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych 14(50): 63-81.
 
32.
Sarnowska, J., Pustułka, P. & Wermińska-Wiśnicka, I. (2020). Słabe państwo i solwatacja społeczna w obszarze łączenia pracy z rodzicielstwem. Studia Socjologiczne, 135-162.
 
33.
Schilling, C. (2003). The Body and the Social Theory. Second edition. Sage Publication.
 
34.
Schnittker, J., Freese, J. & Powell, B. (2003). Who are feminists and what do they believe? The role of generations. American Sociological Review, 607-622.
 
35.
Sennett, R. (1977). The Fall of Public Man. Penguin Books.
 
36.
Sikorska, M. (2016). “Prywatne” i “publiczne” konteksty macierzyństwa oraz rozrodczości – analiza dyskursu publicznego. Societas Communitas 1(21)/2016: 137-156.
 
37.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.
 
38.
Smith, D.E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. University of Toronto Press.
 
39.
Tach, L. (2015). Social mobility in an era of family instability and complexity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1): 83-96.
 
40.
Thomson R, Kehily, M. Hadfield L. & Sharpe, S. (2011). Making modern mothers. Bristol: Policy Press.
 
41.
Zartler, U. & Hierzer, J. (2015). Efforts to cut the Gordian knot. A sociological analysis regarding legal aspects of post-divorce parental responsibility. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 10: 219-237.
 
ISSN:1640-1808
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top