PL EN
“We are so hermetic”—families’ social isolation as an essential feature of family life in contemporary Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Sociology, University of Warsaw, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2023-05-12
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-09-04
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-09-06
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-10-25
 
 
Publication date: 2023-10-25
 
 
Corresponding author
Malgorzata Sikorska   

Faculty of Sociology, University of Warsaw, ul. Karowa 18, 00-324, Warszawa, Polska
 
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2023;61(2):1-19
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The paper reconstructs relationships between families with children and their social environment consisting of both individuals and institutions. The relationships are identified from the perspective of families. I posit the following research questions: (1) What individuals and what institutions compose the social environment around families and have influence over them? (2) Which individuals and institutions do families trust, and which do they distrust? (3) Which individuals or institutions, in the eyes of interviewees, support their families, and which go against them? Edward C. Banfield’s concept of amoral familism and Stefan Nowak’s notion of sociological vacuum – both linked to social trust – provide a theoretical framework and serve as starting points for my study. The article is based on qualitative research findings. The study applied an inductive approach. I argue that families’ isolation from institutions – I propose the term “families’ social isolation” – is one of the most significant aspects of family life in contemporary Poland. I identify three key components of Polish families’ social isolation: the absence of social institutions that families can trust, families’ disposition to cut themselves off from institutions, and a perception of the family as a safe space as opposed to a “dangerous area” outside.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express her thanks to Jan Wawrzyniak for editing and proofreading and to the Faculty of Sociology, University of Warsaw, for subsidising proofreading costs.
 
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Alesina, Alberto, Giuliano, Paola. 2011. Family Ties and Political Participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9/5 :817–839, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542....
 
2.
Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
 
3.
Bigoni, Maria, Bortolotti, Stefania, Casari, Marco, Gambetta, Diego, Pancotto, Francesca. 2016. Amoral Familism, Social Capital, or Trust? The Behavioural Foundations of the Italian North–South Divide. The Economic Journal, 126/594: 1318–1341, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.1....
 
4.
Bojar, Hanna. 1991. Rodzina i życie rodzinne (in:) Marody Mirosława(red.) Co nam zostało z tych lat … Społeczeństwo polskie u progu zmiany systemowej. London: Wydawnictwo Aneks. pp. 28–69.
 
5.
Braudel, Fernand. 1995. A History of Civilizations [Translated by Richard Mayne]. New York: The Penguin Press.
 
6.
CBOS. 2020. Report Np Nr 43/2020. Zaufanie społeczne. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.PO....
 
7.
CBOS. 2022. Report Nr 37/2022. Zaufanie społeczne. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.PO....
 
8.
Foschi R, Lauriola M. Do Amoral Familism and Political Distrust Really Affect North–South Differences in Italy? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(5):751-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202....
 
9.
Guest, Greg, MacQueen, Kathleen, Namey, Emily. 2012. Applied thematic analysis. SAGE.
 
10.
GUS. 2022. Żłobki i kluby dziecięce w 2021 r. https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/.... Date of access: 10.08.2023.
 
11.
Herreros, Francisko. 2015. Ties that bind: Family relationships and social trust. Rationality and Society, 27(3): 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346....
 
12.
Huysseune, Michel. 2019. The Reception of the Concept of Amoral Familism. International Journal of Politics. Culture, and Society, 33/365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767....
 
13.
Ferragina, Emanuele. 2009. The never-ending debate about The moral basis of a backward society: Banfield and ‘amoral familism’. Journal of Anthropological Society of Oxford, 1(2): 141-160.
 
14.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
 
15.
Füzér, Katalin, Huszár, Ákos, Bodor, Ákos, Bálint Lajos, Pirmajer, Attila. 2020 Social capitals, social class, and prosperity in high-trust and low-trust societies. International Journal of Sociology, 50:1, 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/002076....
 
16.
Jhang, Fang-Hua. 2021. Bonding social capital and political participation: the mediating role of political interest. The Social Science Journal. DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2021.1919846.
 
17.
Kazimierczyk, Iga. 2022. Edukacja dzieci w Polsce - wybrane aspekty. IN: Dzieci się liczą 2022. Raport. Fundacja Dajemy Dzieciom Siłę. https://fdds.pl/_Resources/Per.... Date of access: 10.08.2023.
 
18.
Koralewicz, Jadwiga, Wnuk-Lipiński, Edmund 1987. Życie rodzinne, towarzyskie i publiczne. Wartości i deprywacje. IN: Nierówności i upośledzenia w świadomości społecznej (ed.) Edmund Wnuk-Lipiński, Warsaw: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
 
19.
Neuman, W. Laurence. 2003. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
 
20.
Nowak, Stefan. 1979. System wartości społeczeństwa polskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 75 (4): 155–173.
 
21.
Pawlak, Mikołaj. 2015. From Sociological Vacuum to Horror Vacui: How Stefan Nowak’s Thesis Is Used in Analyses of Polish Society. Polish Sociological Review, 189(1): 5–28.
 
22.
Podgórecki, Adam. 1987. Całościowa analiza społeczeństwa polskiego. IN: VII Ogólnopolski Zjazd Socjologiczny. Materiały (ed.) Edmund Wnuk-Lipiński. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne. pp. 576-612.
 
23.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
 
24.
Reay, Diana. 2014. White middle-class families and urban comprehensives: the struggle for social solidarity in an era of amoral familism. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674....
 
25.
Sadurski, Wojciech. 2019. Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press.
 
26.
Sawicka, Maja, Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2020. Struggling with Emotions in Times of Social Change: Control Restoring Operations in the Workplace and the Family. Polish Sociological Review, 2020/212(4):411–424. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr21...,.
 
27.
Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2019. Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce – rekonstrukcja codzienności. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
 
28.
Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2022. ‘Addictive’ for children and ‘helpful’ to parents: electronic devices as a non-human actor in family relations. Journal of Family Studies, 28:3, 841-857. DOI: 10.1080/13229400.2020.1759446.
 
29.
Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). SAGE.
 
30.
Tarkowska, Elżbieta, Tarkowski, Jacek. 1990. „Amoralny familizm”, czyli o dezintegracji społecznej w Polsce lat osiemdziesiątych. IN: Grupy i więzi w systemie monocentrycznym. (ed.) Edumund Wnuk-Lipiński. Warsaw: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN. pp. 37–69.
 
31.
Wnuk-Lipiński, Edmund. 1982. Dimorphism of Values and Social Schizophrenia: A Tentative Description. Sisyphus. Sociological Studies, 3: 81–89.
 
32.
Woźniak, Wojciech, Kossakowski, Radosław, Nosal, Przemysław. 2020. A Squad with No Left Wingers: The Roots and Structure of Right-Wing and Nationalist Attitudes among Polish Football Fans. Problems of Post-Communism, 67/6: 511-524, https://doi.org/10.1080/107582....
 
33.
Ziółkowski, Marek. 2000. Przemiany interesów i wartości społeczeństwa polskiego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.
 
34.
Żadkowska, Magdalena, Olcoń-Kubicka, Marta, Gądecki, Jacek, Mizielińska, Joanna, Stasińska, Agata, Schmidt, Filip, Halawa, Mateusz. 2018. Metodologiczne aspekty jakościowych badań par – synteza doświadczeń terenowych. Studia Socjologiczne, 3/2018 (230): 41–69, DOI: 10.24425/122472.
 
ISSN:1640-1808
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top