PL EN
CASE REPORT
Gender in social policy models
 
More details
Hide details
1
Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu Katedra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej
Publication date: 2020-06-05
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2004;7:75–87
 
ABSTRACT
In 1990 Esping-Andersen published the „Three worlds of welfare capitalism” since when there has been a heated debate over his typology of welfare states. Although his work is criticised by many some of the most prominent criticism has come from feminist scholars. Esping-Andersen has been accused of being gender blind. His models are based on the situation of average workers, who mostly happen to be men. Women are present in the models as long as they stay on the labour market. This suggests that the criteria of decommodification, stratification and relations between state, market and family are not gender neutral. Appreciating the analytical potential of the „three worlds” typology feminists argue for a reformulation in ways that allow the inclusion of gender differences. They stress the need to build an analytical framework that reflects the differences in caring responsibilities between men and women, and show the significance of household production for the welfare of the family. This article discusses the main issues involved in the above debate in three sections. The first presents the Esping-Andersen’s models with particular attention paid to the criteria used to construct them. The next section is devoted to fields of feminist critique. The final part presents an overview of the feminists work on constructing models, which are gender sensitive.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Anttonen A., Sipila J. (1996), European social care services: is it possible to identify models?, „Journal of European Social Policy” t. 6, nr 2, s. 87-100.
 
2.
Bussemaker J., van Kersbergen K. (1994), Gender and welfare state: some theoretical reflections, w: Gendering welfare state, (red) Sainsbury D., SAGE, London, Thousend Oaks, New De hli, s. 9-25.
 
3.
Castles F.G., Mitchell D. (1993), Worlds o f welfare and families o f nations, w: Families of Nations, Patterns o f public policy in western democracies, (red) F.G.Castles, Dartmouth, Aldershot, s. 93-128.
 
4.
Daly M. (1994), Comparing welfare states: towards a gender friendly approach, w: Gendering welfare state, (red) D. Sainsbury,, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, s. 101-117.
 
5.
Duncan S. (1995), Theorizing European gender system, „Journal of European Social Policy”, nr 5 (4), s. 263-284.
 
6.
Esping-Andersen G. (1990), Three worlds o f welfare capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
 
7.
Esping-Andersen G. (1996), Welfare states without work: the impasse o f labour shedding and familialism in continental European social policy, w: (red.) G. Esping-Andersen, Welfare state in transition: national adaptations in global economies, Sage, London, s. 66-87.
 
8.
Esping-Andersen G.(1999), Social foundations o f postindustrial economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
 
9.
Esping-Andersen G. (2000), Interview on postindustrialism and the future o f the welfare state, Work, employment and society, t. 14, nr 4, s. 757-769.
 
10.
Esping-Andersen G.(2002), A new gender contract, w: Why we need a new welfare state, G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerjick, J. Myles, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.68-95.
 
11.
Ferrera M. (1996), The „ southern model ” o f welfare in social Europe, „Journal of European Social Policy”, t. 6, nr 1, s. 17-37.
 
12.
Kessler-Harris A. (2003), In pursuit o f economic citizenship, „Social Politics”, t. 10, nr 2, s. 157-175.
 
13.
Langan M., Ostner I. (1991), Gender and welfare, towards a comparative framework, w: Towards European welfare state?, (red.) G. Room, S.A.U.S, Bristol, s. 127-150.
 
14.
Leibfried S. (1992), Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community, w (red) Social Policy in changing Europe, Z. Ferge, J.E. Kolberg, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M, s. 244-261.
 
15.
Lewis J. (1992), Gender and development o f welfare regimes, „Journal of European Social Policy” t. 2, nr 3, s. 159-173.
 
16.
Lewis J. (1997), Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts, „Social Politics" nr 3, s. 160-177.
 
17.
Lundberg S., Poliak R.A. (1997), Bargaining and distribution in marriage, w: Economics of the fam ily and family policies, (red) I. Persson, Ch. Jonung, Routledge, London, New York. s. 23 -43.
 
18.
O’Connor J., Orloff S., Shaver S. (1999), States, markets, families. Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
 
19.
Orloff A.S. (1993), Gender and the social rights o f citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states, „American Sociological Review”, t. 58, s. 303-328.
 
20.
Ott N., (1992) Intrafamily bargaining and household decisions, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest.
 
21.
Sainsbury D. (1994), Women’s and men’s social rights: gendering dimensions of welfare states, w: Gendering welfare state, (red) D. Sainsbury, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, s. 151-169.
 
22.
Titmuss R.M. (1974), Social policy, an introduction, Pantheon Books, New York.
 
ISSN:1640-1808