PL EN
CASE REPORT
Cultural boundaries
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Vaasa School of Management, Philosophy
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Tommi Lehtonen   

University of Vaasa, School of Management, Philosophy, Yliopistonranta 10, 65200 Vaasa, Fabriikki F339; author’s email address: Tommi.Lehtonen@uwasa.fi
Publication date: 2020-05-18
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2019;46:43–60
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper seeks to resolve the problem of redefining cultural boundaries. Therefore, the following questions are addressed: 1) To what do cultural boundaries refer, and of what do they basically consist? 2) On what conditions and to what extent is the metaphor of cultural boundaries appropriate? 3) On what conditions can cultural boundaries be broken or crossed? These questions are examined based on a philosophical analysis that draws from Dave Elder-Vass’s The Reality of Social Construction (2012) and Alasdair MacIntyre’s Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (2003). As a major result, it is shown that the metaphor of boundaries is an appropriate tool for cultural studies, insofar as it helps to explain why different norms are followed in different cultures, and how cultural conflicts are related to breaking of norms endorsed and enforced by different social groups. The metaphor of boundaries fits this task, because with the help of it different cultures and social groups can be structured and represented as distinct collective entities, yet with blurred and changing borders, that can side, collide, and overlap with each other.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Achebe, Ch. (1958/1994). Things Fall Apart. New York: Anchor Books.
 
2.
Apel, K.-O. (1973). Transformation der Philosophie, Band 2: Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
 
3.
Bertalanffy, L., von (1969). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. Revised edition. New York: George Braziller.
 
4.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
 
5.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
 
6.
Douglas, M. (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. London: SAGE Publications.
 
7.
Douglas, M. (2003). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. Second edition. New York: Routledge.
 
8.
Elder-Vass, D. (2012). The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
9.
Grathoff, R., Kłoskowska, A. (eds.) (1994). The Neighbourhood of Cultures. Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences.
 
10.
Hannerz, U. (2002). Flows, Boundaries and Hybrids: Keywords in Transnational Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
11.
Lehtonen, T. (2014a). The perspective challenge. Minerva: An Online Open Access Journal of Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 86–110.
 
12.
Lehtonen, T. (2014b). What is this thing called democracy? A discussion from the perspective of subjective global multi-attractedness. In: S. Lamminpää, Ch. Rink (eds.), Demokratia, Demokrati, Democracy, Demokratie. VAKKI-symposiumi XXXIV 13.–14.2.2014 (pp. 16–45). VAKKI Publications 3. Vaasa: VAKKI.
 
13.
Lehtonen, T. (2015). Cultural boundaries: imaginary or real? In: D. Rellstab, N. Siponkoski (eds.), Borders under Negotiation. VAKKI-symposiumi XXXV 12.–13.2.2015 (pp. 46–55). VAKKI Publications 4. Vaasa: VAKKI.
 
14.
MacIntyre, A. (2003). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
 
15.
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
16.
Morton, T. (2010). The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
17.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
 
18.
O’Neill, O. (2016). Justice across Boundaries: Whose Obligations? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
19.
Ritzer, G. (2004). Globalization of Nothing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
 
20.
Taylor, Ch. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
21.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with a Revised English Translation. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, edited by G.E.M. Anscombe & R. Rhees. Third edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
 
ISSN:1640-1808