PL EN
Z WARSZTATÓW BADAWCZYCH
A Comparative Study of Unemployment Compensation in Central and Eastern Europe
 
More details
Hide details
1
Maastricht Graduate School of Governance
2
European University Institute, Florencja
Publication date: 2020-06-05
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2008;11:109–133
 
ABSTRACT
This article investigates trends in an unemployment compensation in eight countries, which joined the EU in 2004 in the period 1989-2004. By focusing on eligibility criteria, generosity and duration of benefi ts on the one hand and obligations of unemployed on the other, the paper identifi es different policy mixes. Based on the ideal-type fuzzy set approach, the article fi nds a great variety of unemployment compensation models. There is no consolidation of this policy across the region, therefore it is hard to cluster the countries. The most stable cases were the ones which already provided the compensation before the transition started. Changes in the ideal types of the unemployment compensation were rather incremental than revolutionary. The direction of these changes can be observed by identifying new dominating combinations of policies conversing the existing institutional solutions.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Arts, W., Gelissen, J. (2002), Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-ofthe-art report, „Journal of European Social Policy”, 12(2), s. 137-158.
 
2.
Centre for Co-operation with Economies in Transition (1996), Lessons from labour market policies in the transition countries, Organisation for Economic Co-operaton and Development, Paris.
 
3.
Centre for Co-operation with Economies in Transition and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1993), The Labour market in Poland, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
 
4.
Cerami, A. (2003), The Impact of Social Transfers in Cental and Eastern Europe, Income Studies Working Paper Series 356, Luxemburg.
 
5.
Clasen, J., Clegg, D. (2006), Beyond Activation: Reforming European Unemployment Protection Systems in Post-Industrial Labour Markets, „European Societies”, 8(4), s. 527-553.
 
6.
Clasen, J., Kvist, J. i in. (2001), On condition of work: Increasing work requirements in unemployment compensation schemes, (w:) M. Kauto, J. Fritzell, B. Kautto, J. Kvist i H. Uusitalo (red.) Nordic Welfare States in the European Context, Routledge, London and New York, s. 198-231.
 
7.
Deacon, B. (red.) (1992a), Social policy, social justice and citizenship in Eastern Europe, Avebury, Aldershot [England], Brookfi eld, Vt.
 
8.
Deacon, B. (1992b), The New Eastern Europe: social policy past, present and future, Sage Publications, London, Newbury Park.
 
9.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, London.
 
10.
Esping-Andersen, G. (red.) (1996), Welfare States in Transition, Sage Publications, London.
 
11.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
12.
Esping-Andersen, G., Regini, M. (red.) (2000), Why deregulate labour markets?, pobrano z: http://www.oxfordscholarship.c....
 
13.
Gallie, D., Paugam, S. (2000), Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
 
14.
Gilbert, N. (2002), Transformation of the welfare state : the silent surrender of public responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
 
15.
Hall, P., Soskice, D. (red.) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
16.
ILO (1995), Reforming wage policy in Central and Eastern Europe, ILO, Budapest.
 
17.
Jessop, B. (2002), The future of the capitalist state, Polity, Distributed in the USA by Blackwell, Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA.
 
18.
Kurowski, P. (2002), Koszyki minimum socjalnego i minimum egzystencji - dotychczasowe podejście, pobrano z: http://www.ipiss.com.pl/teksty..., IPiSS, Warszawa.
 
19.
Kvist, J. (1999), Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s: using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types, „Journal of European Social Policy”, 9(3), s. 231-252.
 
20.
Kvist, J. (2000), Changing rights and obligations in unemployment compensation: Using fuzzy-set theory to explore the diversity of Northern European policy developments in the 1990s., The Year 2000 International Research Conference on Social Security, Helsinki 25-27 September 2000.
 
21.
Kvist, J. (2006), Diversity, ideal types and fuzzy sets in comparative welfare state research, (w:) B. Rihoux, H. Grimm (red.) Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide, Springer, New York, s. 167-184.
 
22.
Lazarsfeld, P. (1937), Some Remarks on Typological Procedures in Social Sciences, „Zeitschrift fur Socialforschung”, (6), s. 119-139.
 
23.
Pierson, P. (2001), The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
 
24.
Poole, L. (2000), New Approaches to Comparative Social Policy: the Changing Face of Central and Eastern European Welfare, (w:) G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz, J. Clarke (red.) Rethinking Social Policy, SAGE, London, s. 185-200.
 
25.
Ragin, C. (2000), Fuzzy-set social science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
 
26.
Riboud, M., Sánchez-Páramo, C. i in. (2002), Does eurosclerosis matter?: institutional reform and labor market performance in Central and Eastern Europe, World Bank, Washington, DC.
 
27.
Streeck, W., Thelen, K. A. (2005), Beyond continuity : institutional change in advanced political economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
 
28.
Szelewa, D., Polakowski, M. (2008), Who Cares? Changing Patterns of Childcare in Central and Eastern Europe, „Journal of European Social Policy”, 18(2), s. 115- 131.
 
29.
Titmuss, R. M. (1976), Problems of social policy, HMSO, Kraus Reprint, London, Nendeln.
 
30.
Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (1995), Minimum Wages in Central and Eastern Europe: Slippage of the Anchor, (w:) G. Standing, D. Vaughan-Whitehad (red.) Minimum Wages in Central and Eastern Europe: From Protection to Destitution, ILO and CEU, Budapest.
 
ISSN:1640-1808