PL EN
CASE REPORT
Public perception of Syrian refugees in Turkey: an empirical explanation using extended integrative threat theory
Mehmet Hanefi Topal 1  
,   Ufuk Özer 2  
,   Emrah Dokuzlu 3  
 
More details
Hide details
1
Gümüşhane University
2
Kırklareli University
3
Polish Academy of Science
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mehmet Hanefi Topal   

Gümüşhane University, Department of Public Finance, IIBF, Merkez, 29100 Gümüşhane, Turkey; author’s internet address: mhanefitopal@gmail.com
Ufuk Özer   

Kırklareli University, Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Kayalı Campus, 2. Main Building, 39100 Kırklareli, Turkey; author’s internet address: ufukozer@gmail.com
Emrah Dokuzlu   

Polish Academy of Science, Graduate School for Social Research, Department of Sociology, Nowy Świat 72, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland; author’s internet address: emrahdokuzlu@gmail.com
Publication date: 2020-05-22
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2017;38:35–58
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Turkey has provided asylum for Syrian refugees following the civil war in Syria. This process has given rise to considerable public debate, which is often associated with negative attitudes within the community. Previous studies have indicated that realistic and symbolic threats are important components of the integrated theory of threat for understanding opposition towards immigrants and refugees. But the extended Integrative Threat Theory (ITT) suggests that the citizens of the host country may perceive refugees as both threat and benefit. The purpose of this study is to examine the public perception of Syrian refugees in Turkey using extended ITT model. The main results of the analysis are that Turkish people perceive Syrian refugees both as a threat and benefit. Nevertheless, benefit perception is higher than threat perception in Turkey.
 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Anderson, J.R., Stuart, A., Rossen, I. (2015). Not all negative: Macro justice principles predict positive attitudes towards asylum seekers in Australia. Australian Journal of Psychology, no. 67(4), p. 207–213.
 
2.
Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, no. 9(1), p. 78–102.
 
3.
Berkman, L.F., Kawachi, I. (2000). Social Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
4.
Bizman, A., Yinon, Y. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, no. 23(3), p. 191–196.
 
5.
Brenner, J., Fertig, M. (2006). Identifying the Determinants of Attitudes towards Immigrants: A Structural Cross-Country Analysis. IZA Discussion Papers, no. 2306.
 
6.
Davidov, E., Meulemann, B., Schwartz, S.H., Schmidt, P. (2014). Individual values, cultural embeddedness, and anti-immigration sentiments: Explaining differences in the effect of values on attitudes toward immigration across Europe. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, no. 66(1), p. 263–285.
 
7.
Deitz, S.L. (2014). Religiosity and Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration. Research Paper, no. 514, online: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs....
 
8.
Erdoğan, M. Murat. (2014). Syrians in Turkey: Social Acceptence and Integration Research. Ankara: The Hacettepe University Migration and Politics Research Centre — HUGO.
 
9.
Hafner, T. (2016). Determinants of Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Denmark. Senior Thesis in Economics, Haverford College.
 
10.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate analysis. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
 
11.
Hung, S.Y., Chang, C.M., Kuo, S.R. (2013). User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, no. 30(1), p. 33–44.
 
12.
Kehrberg, J.E. (2007). Public opinion on immigration in Western Europe: Economics, tolerance, and exposure. Comparative European Politics, no. 5(3), p. 264–281.
 
13.
Leong, C.H. (2008). A multilevel research framework for the analyses of attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, no. 32(2), p. 115–129.
 
14.
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural equation modeling, no. 9(2), p. 151–173.
 
15.
Meade, A.W., Kroustalis, C.M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, no. 9(3), p. 369–403.
 
16.
Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
 
17.
Murray, K.E., Marx, D.M. (2013). Attitudes toward unauthorized immigrants, authorized immigrants, and refugees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, no. 19(3), p. 332.
 
18.
Partridge, E.J. (2016). Exploring Predictors of Canadian Attitudes Toward Syrian Refugees and How They Should be Helped. Undergraduate Honors Theses, paper 32, online: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=psychK_uht.
 
19.
Pedersen, A., Attwell, J., Heveli, D. (2005). Prediction of negative attitudes toward Australian asylum seekers: False beliefs, nationalism, and self-esteem. Australian Journal of Psychology, no. 57(3), p. 148–160.
 
20.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, no. 8(2), p. 23–74.
 
21.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, no. 25, p. 1–65.
 
22.
Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, no. 2(1), p. 1–20.
 
23.
Stephan, W.G., Stephan, C.W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, no. 20(3), p. 409–426.
 
24.
Tartakovsky, E., Walsh, S.D. (2016). Testing a new theoretical model for attitudes toward immigrants. The Case of Social Workers ’Attitudes toward asylum seekers in Israel’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, no. 47(1), p. 72–96. DOI: 10.1177/0022022115613860.
 
25.
UNHCR. (2016a). Syria Regional Refugee Response. Online: http://data.unhcr.org/syrianre... regional.php [accessed 25.07.2016].
 
26.
UNHCR. (2016b). Syria Regional Refugee Response. Online: http://data.unhcr.org/syrianre... country.php?id=224 [accessed 25.07.2016].
 
27.
Ward, C., Masgoret, A.M. (2008). Attitudes toward Immigrants, Immigration, and Multiculturalism in New Zealand: A Social Psychological Analysis. International Migration Review, no. 42(1), p. 227–248.
 
ISSN:1640-1808